This HTML5 document contains 115 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n29https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/
n25https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n26https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
n16https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/548/53/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
n23https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n30http://www.lawmemo.com/docs/us/white/
n4https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/364/789/533031/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n5https://web.archive.org/web/20121030062506/http:/everydaypsychology.com/2012/03/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n21http://everydaypsychology.com/2012/03/
n27https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/
n12http://www.osha.gov/as/opa/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n6https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
n24https://archive.today/20130123124702/http:/www.foxrothschild.com/newspubs/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Burlington_Northern_&_Santa_Fe_Railway_Co._v._White
rdf:type
dbo:Case umbel-rc:Event owl:Thing yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Abstraction100002137 wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Case107308889 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt dbo:UnitOfWork dbo:LegalCase
rdfs:label
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
rdfs:comment
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on sexual harassment and retaliatory discrimination. It was a landmark case for retaliation claims. It set a precedent for claims which could be considered retaliatory under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In this case the standard for retaliation against a sexual harassment complainant was revised to include any adverse employment decision or treatment that would be likely to dissuade a "reasonable worker" from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.
foaf:name
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Petitioner v. Sheila White
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_employment_discrimination_case_law dbc:Harassment_case_law dbc:Railway_litigation_in_2006 dbc:Sexual_harassment_in_the_United_States dbc:United_States_case_law dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_gender_discrimination_case_law dbc:BNSF_Railway dbc:United_States_labor_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
5674144
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1115389752
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbc:United_States_labor_case_law dbr:F.3d dbr:Sexual_harassment dbr:BNSF_Railway dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Eric_L._Clay dbr:Gregory_G._Garre dbr:Maintenance_of_Way dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit dbr:L._Ed._2d dbc:United_States_employment_discrimination_case_law dbr:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_548 dbr:Equal_Employment_Opportunity_Commission dbr:Robert_B._Krupansky dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Title_VII_of_the_Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964 dbr:James_S._Gwin dbr:US_labor_law dbc:Harassment_case_law dbc:Railway_litigation_in_2006 dbc:Sexual_harassment_in_the_United_States dbr:En_banc dbc:United_States_case_law dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbc:BNSF_Railway dbc:United_States_gender_discrimination_case_law dbr:6th_Cir. dbr:Solicitor_General_of_the_United_States dbr:Tennessee
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n4: n5:what-is-workplace-retaliation-its-about.html%23.UKGjeGm_dGk n6:05-259 n12:whistleblowermemo.html n16: n21:what-is-workplace-retaliation-its-about.html%23.UKGjeGm_dGk n23:05-259.pdf n24:newspubsArticle.aspx%3Fid=6668 n27:2000e-3 n29:05-259.html n25:05-259.ZS.html n30:
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0dzgtf yago-res:Burlington_Northern_&_Santa_Fe_Railway_Co._v._White wikidata:Q4999263 n26:4dJh3
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist dbt:When dbt:Webarchive dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Ussc dbt:UnitedStatesCode
dbp:docket
5
dbp:joinmajority
Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Thomas
dbp:lawsapplied
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 42 U. S. C. ยง2000e-2;
dbp:oyez
n6:05-259
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
53
dbp:usvol
548
dbp:arguedate
0001-04-17
dbp:argueyear
2006
dbp:case
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White,
dbp:date
2012-10-30
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-22
dbp:decideyear
2006
dbp:fullname
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Petitioner v. Sheila White
dbp:holding
The anti-retaliation provision under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not confine the actions and harms it forbids to those that are related to employment or occur at the workplace.
dbp:justia
n16:
dbp:litigants
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White
dbp:majority
Breyer
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n23:05-259.pdf
dbp:url
n5:what-is-workplace-retaliation-its-about.html%23.UKGjeGm_dGk
dbo:abstract
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on sexual harassment and retaliatory discrimination. It was a landmark case for retaliation claims. It set a precedent for claims which could be considered retaliatory under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In this case the standard for retaliation against a sexual harassment complainant was revised to include any adverse employment decision or treatment that would be likely to dissuade a "reasonable worker" from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.
dbp:concurrence
Alito
dbp:cornell
n25:05-259.ZS.html
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Burlington_Northern_&_Santa_Fe_Railway_Co._v._White?oldid=1115389752&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
12445
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Burlington_Northern_&_Santa_Fe_Railway_Co._v._White