https://dbpedia.org/sparql?query=define%20sql%3Adescribe-mode%20%22CBD%22%20%20DESCRIBE%20%3Chttp%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FBurlington_Northern_%26_Santa_Fe_Railway_Co._v._White%3E&output=application%2Fatom%2Bxml2024-03-29T15:02:52.119201ZOData Service and Descriptor Documenthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Burlington_Northern_&_Santa_Fe_Railway_Co._v._White2024-03-29T15:02:52.119201ZBurlington Northern & Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on sexual harassment and retaliatory discrimination. It was a landmark case for retaliation claims. It set a precedent for claims which could be considered retaliatory under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In this case the standard for retaliation against a sexual harassment complainant was revised to include any adverse employment decision or treatment that would be likely to dissuade a "reasonable worker" from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteThe anti-retaliation provision under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not confine the actions and harms it forbids to those that are related to employment or occur at the workplace.1115389752172800.05482006Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 42 U. S. C. ยง2000e-2;2006Alito5674144Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Thomas12445Supreme CourtBurlington Northern & Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006), is a US labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on sexual harassment and retaliatory discrimination. It was a landmark case for retaliation claims. It set a precedent for claims which could be considered retaliatory under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In this case the standard for retaliation against a sexual harassment complainant was revised to include any adverse employment decision or treatment that would be likely to dissuade a "reasonable worker" from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Petitioner v. Sheila White25920.02012-10-305--04-17--06-22Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Petitioner v. Sheila WhiteBurlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteBreyer53Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White,