This HTML5 document contains 91 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n10https://scholar.google.com/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n11https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/98344/burdick-v-united-states/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n20https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/236/
n23https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n21https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/236/
n13http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep236/usrep236079/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n12https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/236/79/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Burdick_v._United_States
rdf:type
yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Event100029378 owl:Thing yago:Case107308889 umbel-rc:Event yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Happening107283608 dbo:Case dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases wikidata:Q2334719
rdfs:label
Burdick v. United States
rdfs:comment
Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that: * A pardoned person must introduce the pardon into court proceedings, otherwise the pardon must be disregarded by the court. * To do that, the pardoned person must accept the pardon. If a pardon is rejected, it cannot be forced upon its subject. United States v. Wilson (1833) established that it is possible to reject a (conditional) pardon, even for a capital sentence. Burdick affirmed that the same principle extends to unconditional pardons.
foaf:name
George Burdick v. United States
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_clemency_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:Pardons dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_White_Court dbc:1915_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
8691538
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1124309552
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:L._Ed. dbr:Pardon dbr:Gerald_Ford dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Pardon_of_Richard_Nixon dbc:United_States_clemency_case_law dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_236 dbr:Dictum dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:United_States_v._Wilson dbr:Protection_of_sources dbr:Woodrow_Wilson dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Capital_punishment_in_the_United_States dbr:Richard_Nixon dbr:S.D.N.Y. dbr:Federal_Reporter dbr:List_of_people_pardoned_or_granted_clemency_by_the_president_of_the_United_States dbc:Pardons dbr:New_York_Tribune dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_White_Court dbr:White_House dbr:Legal_proceeding dbr:Grand_jury dbr:Pleading_the_Fifth dbc:1915_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n10:scholar_case%3Fcase=3928528117882105076 n11: n13:usrep236079.pdf n21:79 n12:case.html n20:79.html
owl:sameAs
yago-res:Burdick_v._United_States freebase:m.027f48f n23:4dHUF wikidata:Q4998296
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Short_description dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Ussc dbt:Reflist dbt:Wikisource-inline
dbp:joinmajority
White, Holmes, Day, Hughes, Van Devanter, Lamar, Pitney
dbp:parallelcitations
35
dbp:prior
United States v. Burdick, 211 F. 492
dbp:uspage
79
dbp:usvol
236
dbp:arguedate
0001-12-16
dbp:argueyear
1914
dbp:case
Burdick v. United States,
dbp:courtlistener
n11:
dbp:decidedate
0001-01-25
dbp:decideyear
1915
dbp:findlaw
n20:79.html
dbp:fullname
George Burdick v. United States
dbp:justia
n12:case.html
dbp:litigants
Burdick v. United States
dbp:majority
McKenna
dbp:loc
n13:usrep236079.pdf
dbo:abstract
Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that: * A pardoned person must introduce the pardon into court proceedings, otherwise the pardon must be disregarded by the court. * To do that, the pardoned person must accept the pardon. If a pardon is rejected, it cannot be forced upon its subject. A pardon is an act of grace, proceeding from the power entrusted with the execution of the laws, which exempts the individual on whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for a crime he has committed. It is the private though official act of the executive magistrate, delivered to the individual for whose benefit it is intended ... A private deed, not communicated to him, whatever may be its character, whether a pardon or release, is totally unknown and cannot be acted on. United States v. Wilson (1833) established that it is possible to reject a (conditional) pardon, even for a capital sentence. Burdick affirmed that the same principle extends to unconditional pardons.
dbp:cornell
n21:79
dbp:googlescholar
n10:scholar_case%3Fcase=3928528117882105076
dbp:notparticipating
McReynolds
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Burdick_v._United_States?oldid=1124309552&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
6963
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Burdick_v._United_States