This HTML5 document contains 71 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/4/37/
n20https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n11http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep004/usrep004037/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n19http://
n21http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Bas_v._Tingy
rdf:type
yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Event100029378 dbo:Case yago:Happening107283608 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:LegalCase yago:Case107308889 owl:Thing dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Abstraction100002137
rdfs:label
Bas v. Tingy
rdfs:comment
Bas v. Tingy, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 37 (1800) was a case in maritime law, argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1800. The parties were John Bas, owner of the private vessel Eliza which was captured by French privateers at sea, and Tingy, commander of a public armed vessel—the Ganges—which recovered the Eliza. Bas v. Tingy occurred in the political context of the Quasi-War, maritime skirmishes between the United States and France. The case is also notable as having the only recorded opinion of associate justice Alfred Moore.
foaf:name
Bas, Plaintiff in Error v. Tingy, Defendant in Error
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Ellsworth_Court dbc:1800_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
dbo:wikiPageID
27708399
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
936334780
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:France dbr:Law_of_war dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Ellsworth_Court dbr:Quasi-War dbr:Samuel_Chase dbr:United_States_Supreme_Court dbr:Marine_salvage dbr:Alexander_J._Dallas_(statesman) dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:William_Paterson_(judge) dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Alfred_Moore dbr:Law_of_salvage dbr:L._Ed. dbc:1800_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Bushrod_Washington dbr:Maritime_law
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n16: n19:www.warpower.us n11:usrep004037.pdf n21:a1_8_11s10.html
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q4866149 yago-res:Bas_v._Tingy freebase:m.0c3x49k n20:4VmDT
dbp:seriatim
Paterson Chase Washington Moore
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Ussc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Reflist
dbp:parallelcitations
4
dbp:uspage
37
dbp:usvol
4
dbp:arguedate
0001-08-14
dbp:argueyear
1800
dbp:case
Bas v. Tingy,
dbp:decidedate
0001-08-15
dbp:decideyear
1800
dbp:fullname
Bas, Plaintiff in Error v. Tingy, Defendant in Error
dbp:justia
n16:
dbp:litigants
Bas v. Tingy
dbp:loc
n11:usrep004037.pdf
dbo:abstract
Bas v. Tingy, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 37 (1800) was a case in maritime law, argued before the United States Supreme Court in 1800. The parties were John Bas, owner of the private vessel Eliza which was captured by French privateers at sea, and Tingy, commander of a public armed vessel—the Ganges—which recovered the Eliza. The case hinged on a matter of the law of salvage, or marine salvage; two separate laws prescribed different rates of compensation for salvors, or rescuers of abandoned or captured ships. A 1798 law stated that the owner of a ship which is recovered by a "public" vessel shall pay one-eighth of the ship's value to the salvors, as recovery fee. A 1799 law had more complex language: if a captured ship is recovered within 24 hours, the owner shall pay the salvors one-eighth its value; if a captured ship is recovered 96 hours after its capture, the owner shall pay the salvor one-half the ship's value. Tingy, the salvor, sought the greater compensation of one-half, while Bas, the owner, sought the lesser payment of one-eighth. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts' decision, validating the later 1799 law's language: Bas would have to pay the higher rate of one-half as recovery fee. Bas v. Tingy occurred in the political context of the Quasi-War, maritime skirmishes between the United States and France. The case is also notable as having the only recorded opinion of associate justice Alfred Moore.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Bas_v._Tingy?oldid=936334780&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
5829
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Bas_v._Tingy