This HTML5 document contains 97 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n18https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/
n20https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/145901/bartlett-v-strickland/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n21https://scholar.google.com/
n23https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/08pdf/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n12https://www.oyez.org/cases/2008/
n5https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n17https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/556/1/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Bartlett_v._Strickland
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Event100029378 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 owl:Thing yago:Happening107283608 umbel-rc:Event dbo:LegalCase dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:UnitOfWork yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Abstraction100002137 dbo:Case yago:Case107308889
rdfs:label
Bartlett v. Strickland
rdfs:comment
Bartlett v. Strickland, 556 U.S. 1 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which a plurality of the Court held that a minority group must constitute a numerical majority of the voting-age population in an area before section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires the creation of a legislative district to prevent dilution of that group's votes. The decision struck down a North Carolina redistricting plan that attempted to preserve minority voting power in a 39% black North Carolina House of Representatives district.
foaf:name
Gary Bartlett, Executive Director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, et al., Petitioners v. Dwight Strickland, et al.
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law dbc:North_Carolina_House_of_Representatives dbc:2009_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court
dbo:wikiPageID
21893418
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1092489187
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Thornburg_v._Gingles dbc:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Justice_Ginsburg dbr:North_Carolina_House_of_Representatives dbr:Justice_Breyer dbr:Voting_Rights_Act dbr:Supreme_Court_of_North_Carolina dbr:Anthony_Kennedy dbc:North_Carolina_House_of_Representatives dbr:Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965 dbr:Justice_Souter dbc:2009_in_United_States_case_law dbr:John_Glover_Roberts,_Jr. dbr:Certiorari dbr:Justice_Alito dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:North_Carolina dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Justice_Scalia
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n12:07-689 n17: n21:scholar_case%3Fcase=5422151743103474755 n20: n23:07-689.pdf n18:07-689.ZS.html
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.05p4l2n n5:4WLF2 yago-res:Bartlett_v._Strickland wikidata:Q4865425
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Ussc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:North_Carolina dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:USRedistrictinglaw dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub
dbp:dissent
Souter Ginsburg Breyer
dbp:joindissent
Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965
dbp:oyez
n12:07-689
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina
dbp:uspage
1
dbp:usvol
556
dbp:arguedate
0001-10-14
dbp:argueyear
2008
dbp:case
Bartlett v. Strickland,
dbp:courtlistener
n20:
dbp:decidedate
0001-03-09
dbp:decideyear
2009
dbp:fullname
Gary Bartlett, Executive Director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, et al., Petitioners v. Dwight Strickland, et al.
dbp:holding
A minority group must constitute a numerical majority of the voting-age population in an area before section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires the creation of a legislative district to prevent dilution of that group’s votes.
dbp:justia
n17:
dbp:litigants
Bartlett v. Strickland
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n23:07-689.pdf
dbo:abstract
Bartlett v. Strickland, 556 U.S. 1 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which a plurality of the Court held that a minority group must constitute a numerical majority of the voting-age population in an area before section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires the creation of a legislative district to prevent dilution of that group's votes. The decision struck down a North Carolina redistricting plan that attempted to preserve minority voting power in a 39% black North Carolina House of Representatives district. Justice Kennedy delivered the decision and was joined by Justices Alito and Roberts. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion that was joined by Justice Scalia. Justice Souter filed a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer. Justices Ginsburg and Breyer also filed separate dissenting opinions.
dbp:concurrence
Thomas
dbp:cornell
n18:07-689.ZS.html
dbp:googlescholar
n21:scholar_case%3Fcase=5422151743103474755
dbp:joinconcurrence
Scalia
dbp:joinplurality
Roberts, Alito
dbp:plurality
Kennedy
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Bartlett_v._Strickland?oldid=1092489187&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
3064
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Bartlett_v._Strickland