This HTML5 document contains 76 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n7http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/
n18http://supreme.justia.com/us/359/121/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n16http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep359/usrep359121/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Bartkus_v._Illinois
rdf:type
umbel-rc:Event wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:LegalCase yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Abstraction100002137 dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 owl:Thing yago:Case107308889 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases dbo:Case
rdfs:label
Bartkus v. Illinois
rdfs:comment
Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121 (1959), is a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision held that coordination of federal officials with state officials did not implicate the double jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It also held that a defendant may be acquitted of a federal crime and convicted of a state crime, even if those crimes share the same evidence, without violating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
foaf:name
Bartkus v. Illinois
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Double_Jeopardy_Clause_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbc:1959_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
20436512
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
929099506
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States_of_America dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbc:United_States_Double_Jeopardy_Clause_case_law dbr:Dual_sovereignty_doctrine dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Warren_Court dbr:Double_jeopardy dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:1959_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_U.S._Constitution
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n7:getcase.pl%3Fcourt=US&vol=359&invol=121 n16:usrep359121.pdf n18:case.html
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.04zyvlc wikidata:Q4865338 n17:4W1et yago-res:Bartkus_v._Illinois
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:SCOTUS-stub dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Wikisource dbt:Fifth_Amendment_crimpro dbt:Ussc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbp:dissent
Black Brennan
dbp:joindissent
Warren, Douglas
dbp:joinmajority
Clark, Harlan, Whittaker, Stewart
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:uspage
121
dbp:usvol
359
dbp:arguedate
0001-11-19
dbp:argueyear
1957
dbp:case
Bartkus v. Illinois,
dbp:decidedate
0001-03-30
dbp:decideyear
1959
dbp:findlaw
n7:getcase.pl%3Fcourt=US&vol=359&invol=121
dbp:fullname
Bartkus v. Illinois
dbp:holding
Coordination of federal officials with state officials did not implicate the double jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It also held that a defendant may be acquitted of a federal crime and convicted of a state crime, even if those crimes share the same evidence, without violating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
dbp:justia
n18:case.html
dbp:litigants
Bartkus v. Illinois
dbp:majority
Frankfurter
dbp:loc
n16:usrep359121.pdf
dbo:abstract
Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121 (1959), is a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision held that coordination of federal officials with state officials did not implicate the double jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It also held that a defendant may be acquitted of a federal crime and convicted of a state crime, even if those crimes share the same evidence, without violating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case established the dual sovereign exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause, enabling state and federal prosecutions for substantially similar events.
dbp:rearguedatea
0001-10-21
dbp:rearguedateb
22
dbp:reargueyear
1958
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Bartkus_v._Illinois?oldid=929099506&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
2496
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Bartkus_v._Illinois