. . . . "Balzac v. Porto Rico,"@en . . . "42"^^ . "--04-10"^^ . ""@en . . . . . . "McKenna, Day, Van Devanter, Pitney, McReynolds, Brandeis, Sutherland"@en . . . "Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298 (1922) fue un caso en donde la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos interpret\u00F3 que algunos derechos de la Constituci\u00F3n de los Estados Unidos no aplicaban a los territorios no incorporados. Es conocido como uno de los Casos insulares. El caso se origin\u00F3 cuando el periodista Jes\u00FAs M. Balzac fue condenado por dos casos de \u00EDndole criminal en las cortes locales de Puerto Rico. Balzac apel\u00F3 a la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos. Ante dicho foro, sostuvo que su condici\u00F3n de ciudadano estadounidense le hac\u00EDa acreedor a ser juzgado por un jurado seg\u00FAn la sexta enmienda de la Constituci\u00F3n de los Estados Unidos. La Corte Suprema fall\u00F3 en contra de Balzac argumentado que no todos los derechos de la Constituci\u00F3n de los Estados Unidos aplicaban a un territorio que no estaba incorporado como parte de la uni\u00F3n americana. El Tribunal Supremo aclar\u00F3 que la extensi\u00F3n de la ciudadan\u00EDa estadounidense a los puertorrique\u00F1os a trav\u00E9s de la Ley Jones de 1917 no ten\u00EDa el efecto de incorporar a Puerto Rico a los Estados Unidos. La determinaci\u00F3n de incorporar un territorio tiene que realizarse de forma expresa por el Congreso de los Estados Unidos."@es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "1123156454"^^ . . . . "--03-20"^^ . . . "Holmes"@en . "Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298 (1922), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that certain provisions of the U.S. Constitution did not apply to territories not incorporated into the union. It originated when Jes\u00FAs M. Balzac was prosecuted for criminal libel in a district court of Puerto Rico. Balzac declared that his rights had been violated under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as he was denied a trial by jury since the code of criminal procedure of Puerto Rico did not grant a jury trial in misdemeanor cases. In the appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the judgments of the lower courts on the island in deciding that the provisions of the Constitution did not apply to a territory that belonged to the United States but was not incorporated into t"@en . . "1922"^^ . . . "1922"^^ . . . . . . "Balzac v. Porto Rico"@en . . . "258"^^ . . "Balzac v. Porto Rico"@es . . . . . . . . "Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298 (1922), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that certain provisions of the U.S. Constitution did not apply to territories not incorporated into the union. It originated when Jes\u00FAs M. Balzac was prosecuted for criminal libel in a district court of Puerto Rico. Balzac declared that his rights had been violated under the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as he was denied a trial by jury since the code of criminal procedure of Puerto Rico did not grant a jury trial in misdemeanor cases. In the appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the judgments of the lower courts on the island in deciding that the provisions of the Constitution did not apply to a territory that belonged to the United States but was not incorporated into the Union. It has become known as one of the \"Insular Cases\"."@en . . . "Sixth Amendment protections do not apply to unincorporated territories of the United States."@en . . "6665"^^ . . . . . . . . . "Taft"@en . . . "1580295"^^ . . . "298"^^ . "Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298 (1922) fue un caso en donde la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos interpret\u00F3 que algunos derechos de la Constituci\u00F3n de los Estados Unidos no aplicaban a los territorios no incorporados. Es conocido como uno de los Casos insulares."@es . "Balzac v. People of Porto Rico"@en . . . . . . "Balzac v. Porto Rico"@en . . "Balzac v. People of Porto Rico"@en . . .