. "2001"^^ . . ""@en . . . "30227195"^^ . . . . . . . . "Ninth Circuit Reversed, injunction vacated"@en . . "Even though there is no hearing under the state contractual scheme, because plaintiffs can bring claims in state court, there is no violation of due process"@en . . . "Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc."@en . . . . . . "25920.0"^^ . . "172800.0"^^ . . . . . . "Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc."@en . "--02-26"^^ . . . . . . . "Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., 532 U.S. 189 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned a provision of the California Labor Code which allowed the state to withhold payment to contractors or subcontractors if found in breach of contract, without a specific hearing on the matter. The Court upheld the provision because the companies were still able to pursue a claim in state court."@en . . . . . "Lujan v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc., 532 U.S. 189 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned a provision of the California Labor Code which allowed the state to withhold payment to contractors or subcontractors if found in breach of contract, without a specific hearing on the matter. The Court upheld the provision because the companies were still able to pursue a claim in state court."@en . . . "3193"^^ . . "Arthur S. Lujan, Labor Commissioner of California, et al., v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Incorporated"@en . . . "Arthur S. Lujan, Labor Commissioner of California, et al., v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Incorporated"@en . "Lujan v. G&G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.,"@en . . . . "532"^^ . "2001"^^ . . . "--04-17"^^ . . . "unanimous"@en . . . . "Rehnquist"@en . . . . "1070249035"^^ . "189"^^ . .