. . "Scalia"@en . "501"^^ . . . . "White"@en . . "Blackmun"@en . . . . "Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."@en . . . . . . . . . "Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit"@en . "14521398"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Connecticut v. Doehr"@en . "White"@en . "1"^^ . . . . . . . ""@en . . . . . "unanimous ; Rehnquist, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter"@en . . "Marshall, Stevens, O'Connor"@en . "Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr"@en . . . . . "--01-07"^^ . "Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr"@en . . . . "--06-06"^^ . "Connecticut v. Doehr"@en . . . . . . "993661897"^^ . "Rehnquist"@en . . . "A state law authorizing the prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property at the outset of a lawsuit, without notice to the defendant or a hearing and without any showing of extraordinary circumstances, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."@en . . "172800.0"^^ . . "1991"^^ . . . . "Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."@en . . . "1991"^^ . . . "8016"^^ . . . . . . "Connecticut v. Doehr,"@en . .