"The contract was frustrated because of the injunction"@en . . "58413076"^^ . "There was no implied term dealing with restraint by injunction"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales, (\"Codelfa\") is a widely cited Australian contract law case, which serves as authority for the modern approach to contractual construction. The case greatly influenced the development of the Eastern Suburbs railway line. In terms of contract law, the case addresses questions of frustration, construction and the parol evidence rule. The case diverged from the well established English approach regarding the use of extrinsic evidence in contractual interpretation."@en . . "Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales, (\"Codelfa\") is a widely cited Australian contract law case, which serves as authority for the modern approach to contractual construction. The case greatly influenced the development of the Eastern Suburbs railway line. In terms of contract law, the case addresses questions of frustration, construction and the parol evidence rule. The case diverged from the well established English approach regarding the use of extrinsic evidence in contractual interpretation."@en . . . . ""@en . "Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW"@en . . "Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW"@en . . . . . "21129"^^ . . . . . . "1100100324"^^ . . . "1982-05-11"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .