. . . . . . . . . "Proposition 8 (\u00C5ttonde f\u00F6rslaget) kallades det f\u00F6rslag till till\u00E4gg i Kaliforniens grundlag om att \"enbart gifterm\u00E5l mellan en man och en kvinna \u00E4r giltiga och erk\u00E4nns av staten Kalifornien\", som framlades av Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J Knight, Martin F Guiterrez, Hak-Shing William Tam och Mark A Jansson och segrade i en folkomr\u00F6stning som genomf\u00F6rdes samtidigt med presidentvalet i USA 2008. Enligt valresultaten r\u00F6stade 52,3 % av de r\u00F6stande f\u00F6r f\u00F6rslaget, vilket inneb\u00E4r att det nu \u00E4r en del av delstatens grundlag, men ett antal st\u00E4mningar mot den Kaliforniska staten har l\u00E4mnats in efter detta d\u00E4r man ifr\u00E5gas\u00E4tter om till\u00E4gget \u00E4r giltigt."@sv . . . . "Propozycja 8 w Kalifornii w 2008 roku, (ang. Proposition 8) \u2013 propozycja poprawki konstytucyjnej w ameryka\u0144skim stanie Kalifornia, nad kt\u00F3r\u0105 obywatele tego stanu g\u0142osowali w referendum 4 listopada 2008 roku. Propozycja ta sprecyzowa\u0142a obowi\u0105zuj\u0105c\u0105 w Kalifornii definicj\u0119 zwi\u0105zku ma\u0142\u017Ce\u0144skiego jako zwi\u0105zku \"mi\u0119dzy m\u0119\u017Cczyzn\u0105 i kobiet\u0105\", eliminuj\u0105c prawo par tej samej p\u0142ci do zawierania ma\u0142\u017Ce\u0144stw. Wed\u0142ug wst\u0119pnych wynik\u00F3w, za poprawk\u0105 g\u0142osowa\u0142o ok. 52,5% uprawnionych do g\u0142osowania, przeciw - oko\u0142o 47,5%. Legalno\u015B\u0107 poprawki zosta\u0142a potwierdzona wyrokiem S\u0105du Najwy\u017Cszego Kalifornii w 2009."@pl . . . . "Proposition 8"@nl . . . . . . . . . . . . "340611"^^ . . . . . "Yes"@en . . . . "Proposition 8"@in . "#01387b"@en . . . "California Proposition 8"@it . "8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\uFF08\u82F1\u6587\uFF1AProposition 8\uFF0C\u7B80\u5199\u4E3AProp 8\uFF09\u662F\u7F8E\u56FD\u52A0\u5229\u798F\u5C3C\u4E9A\u5DDE2008\u5E7411\u6708\u7684\u4E00\u9879\u5DDE\u5BAA\u6CD5\u4FEE\u6B63\u6295\u7968\u63D0\u6848\u3002 \u8BE5\u63D0\u6848\u81F4\u529B\u4E8E\u5C06\u52A0\u5229\u798F\u5C3C\u4E9A\u5DDE\u5185\u5A5A\u59FB\u5173\u7CFB\u7684\u5B9A\u4E49\u4EC5\u9650\u5B9A\u4E8E\u5F02\u6027\u4E4B\u95F4\uFF0C\u4ECE\u800C\u5426\u5B9A\u540C\u6027\u5A5A\u59FB\u3002\u7531\u4E8E8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u4ECE\u6839\u672C\u4E0A\u6539\u53D8\u4E86\u52A0\u5DDE\u5BAA\u6CD5\u5BF9\u5A5A\u59FB\u7684\u5B9A\u4E49\uFF0C\u56E0\u6B64\u5E9F\u9664\u4E86\u52A0\u5DDE\u6700\u9AD8\u6CD5\u9662\u5728\u4E2D\u7684\u5224\u51B3\u3002\u6839\u636E\u8BE5\u63D0\u6848\uFF0C\u5DDE\u5BAA\u6CD5\u7B2C\u4E00\u6761\uFF08Article I\uFF09\u5C06\u65B0\u589E\u6DFB\u4E00\u6B3E(7.5\u6B3E)\uFF0C\u5176\u5185\u5BB9\u662F\uFF1A\u201C\u5728\u52A0\u5229\u798F\u5C3C\u4E9A\u5DDE\uFF0C\u53EA\u6709\u4E00\u7537\u4E0E\u4E00\u5973\u7684\u5A5A\u59FB\u662F\u5408\u6CD5\u548C\u53D7\u5230\u8BA4\u53EF\u7684\u3002\u201D 2008\u5E7411\u67084\u65E5\uFF0C8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u4EE552%\u7684\u6295\u7968\u7387\u83B7\u5F97\u901A\u8FC7\uFF0C\u5E76\u4E8E\u6B21\u65E5\u6B63\u5F0F\u751F\u6548\u3002\u867D\u7136\u52A0\u5DDE\u653F\u5E9C\u5C06\u4E0D\u518D\u5411\u540C\u6027\u4F34\u4FA3\u7B7E\u53D1\u5A5A\u59FB\u8BC1\u4E66\uFF0C\u4F46\u8BE5\u63D0\u6848\u5E76\u4E0D\u5F71\u54CD\u52A0\u5DDE\u7684\u6C11\u4E8B\u7ED3\u5408\u3002 8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u7684\u652F\u6301\u6D3E\u4E0E\u53CD\u5BF9\u6D3E\u5728\u6295\u7968\u6218\u4E2D\u5404\u82B1\u8D39\u4E863580\u4E07\u7F8E\u5143\u548C3760\u4E07\u7F8E\u5143\uFF0C\u662F\u622A\u81F3\u5F53\u65F6\u5168\u7F8E\u5404\u5DDE\u8D44\u91D1\u6700\u9AD8\u7684\u6295\u7968\u63D0\u6848\uFF0C\u5176\u82B1\u9500\u8D85\u8FC7\u8FC7\u5F80\u9664\u4E86\u603B\u7EDF\u9009\u6218\u5916\u6240\u6709\u7684\u62C9\u7968\u6218\u3002\u652F\u6301\u8005\u575A\u79F0\u53EA\u5E94\u5B58\u5728\u5F02\u6027\u604B\u5A5A\u59FB\uFF0C\u5982\u4E0D\u626D\u8F6C\u6700\u9AD8\u6CD5\u9662\u4E8E2008\u5E745\u6708\u8D77\u627F\u8BA4\u540C\u6027\u5A5A\u59FB\u6743\u5229\u7684\u88C1\u51B3\uFF0C\u5C31\u4F1A\u635F\u5BB3\u793E\u4F1A\uFF0C\u6539\u53D8\u5B66\u6821\u5728\u5A5A\u59FB\u65B9\u9762\u6559\u5BFC\u7684\u5185\u5BB9\uFF0C\u751A\u81F3\u5A01\u80C1\u5230\u5B97\u6559\u81EA\u7531\u3002\u53CD\u5BF9\u8005\u5219\u8BA4\u4E3A\uFF0C\u8BE5\u63D0\u6848\u635F\u5BB3\u4E86\u6240\u6709\u52A0\u5229\u798F\u5C3C\u4E9A\u4EBA\u7684\u6743\u5229\uFF0C\u4E14\u4F7F\u67D0\u4E00\u7279\u5B9A\u4EBA\u7FA4\u53D7\u5230\u4E86\u4E0D\u516C\u5E73\u7684\u5BF9\u5F85\uFF0C\u8FD9\u662F\u4E0D\u516C\u5E73\u4E14\u6781\u7AEF\u9519\u8BEF\u7684\u3002 2010\u5E748\u67084\u65E5\uFF0C\u7F8E\u56FD\u8054\u90A6\u5730\u65B9\u6CD5\u9662\u6CD5\u5B98\u5728\u4E00\u6848\u4E2D\u5224\u5B9A8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u8FDD\u53CD\u4E86\u7F8E\u56FD\u5BAA\u6CD5\u4E2D\u7684\u7B2C\u5341\u56DB\u689D\u4FEE\u6B63\u6848\uFF0C\u56E0\u6B64\u5BA3\u5E038\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u65E0\u6548\u3002"@zh . . . . . . . "6401482"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "#000"@en . . . . . . . "Proposition 8 (engl. \u201E[Volksentscheid zu einem] Gesetzesvorhaben\u201C) war ein Antrag zur \u00C4nderung der kalifornischen Verfassung per Referendum mit dem Ziel, nur noch heterosexuelle Ehen staatlich anzuerkennen. In der Abstimmung am 4. November 2008 sprach sich die Mehrheit der Stimmen f\u00FCr den Vorschlag und damit gegen die gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe aus, die von Juni 2008 bis zur Verfassungs\u00E4nderung als verfassungsm\u00E4\u00DFig geboten galten und praktiziert wurden. Die Kampagne um Proposition 8 und die Konsequenzen der erfolgreichen Abstimmung hatten erheblichen Einfluss auf die Politik und Rechtsprechung der Vereinigten Staaten in den darauf folgenden Jahren."@de . . . . . . "Proposition 8 (engl. \u201E[Volksentscheid zu einem] Gesetzesvorhaben\u201C) war ein Antrag zur \u00C4nderung der kalifornischen Verfassung per Referendum mit dem Ziel, nur noch heterosexuelle Ehen staatlich anzuerkennen. In der Abstimmung am 4. November 2008 sprach sich die Mehrheit der Stimmen f\u00FCr den Vorschlag und damit gegen die gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe aus, die von Juni 2008 bis zur Verfassungs\u00E4nderung als verfassungsm\u00E4\u00DFig geboten galten und praktiziert wurden. Die Kampagne um Proposition 8 und die Konsequenzen der erfolgreichen Abstimmung hatten erheblichen Einfluss auf die Politik und Rechtsprechung der Vereinigten Staaten in den darauf folgenden Jahren. 2010 erkl\u00E4rte ein Bundesgericht die Volksabstimmung f\u00FCr verfassungswidrig. Einspr\u00FCche gegen dieses Urteil wies der Oberste Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten im Juni 2013 zur\u00FCck, so dass die Abstimmung \u00FCber Proposition 8 ung\u00FCltig war."@de . "Proposition 8, known informally as Prop 8, was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment intended to ban same-sex marriage; it passed in the November 2008 California state elections and was later overturned in court. The proposition was created by opponents of same-sex marriage in advance of the California Supreme Court's May 2008 appeal ruling, In re Marriage Cases, which followed the short-lived 2004 same-sex weddings controversy and found the previous ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 22, 2000) unconstitutional. Proposition 8 was ultimately ruled unconstitutional by a federal court (on different grounds) in 2010, although the court decision did not go into effect until June 26, 2013, following the conclusion of proponents' appeals. Proposition 8 countermanded the 2008 ruling by adding the same provision as in Proposition 22 to the California Constitution, providing that \"only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California\", thereby superseding the 2008 ruling. As an amendment, it was ruled constitutional by the California Supreme Court in Strauss v. Horton, in 2009, on the grounds that it \"carved out a limited [or 'narrow'] exception to the state equal protection clause\"; in his dissent, Justice Carlos R. Moreno wrote that exceptions to the equal protection clause could not be made by any majority since its whole purpose was to protect minorities against the will of a majority. Legal challenges to Proposition 8 were presented by opponents quickly after its approval. Following affirmation by the state courts, two same-sex couples filed a lawsuit against the initiative in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in the case Perry v. Schwarzenegger (later Hollingsworth v. Perry). In August 2010, Chief Judge Vaughn Walker ruled that the amendment was unconstitutional under both the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, since it purported to re-remove rights from a disfavored class only, with no rational basis. The official proponents' justifications for the measure were analyzed in over fifty pages covering eighty findings of fact. The state government supported the ruling and refused to defend the law. The ruling was stayed pending appeal by the proponents of the initiative. On February 7, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 2\u20131 decision, reached the same conclusion as the district court, but on narrower grounds. The court ruled that it was unconstitutional for California to grant marriage rights to same-sex couples, only to take them away shortly after. The ruling was stayed pending appeal to the United States Supreme Court. On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision on the appeal in the case Hollingsworth v. Perry, ruling that proponents of initiatives such as Proposition 8 did not possess legal standing in their own right to defend the resulting law in federal court, either to the Supreme Court or (previously) to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Therefore, the Supreme Court vacated the decision of the Ninth Circuit, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The decision left the district court's 2010 ruling intact. On June 28, 2013, the Ninth Circuit, on remand, dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and dissolved their previous stay of the district court's ruling, enabling Governor Jerry Brown to order same-sex marriages to resume. The passage of Proposition 8 received widespread media coverage over the amendment's effect on the concurrent 2008 presidential and congressional elections, as well as the pre-election effects Proposition 8 had on California's reputation as a historically LGBT-friendly state and the same-sex marriage debate that had started after same-sex marriage was legalized in Massachusetts through a 2004 court decision. After the results were certified and same-sex marriages ceased, supporters of the initiative were targeted by opponents with actions ranging from some opponents disclosing supporter donations and boycotting proponents' businesses, to others threatening supporters with death and vandalizing churches."@en . . "Proposition 8, known informally as Prop 8, was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment intended to ban same-sex marriage; it passed in the November 2008 California state elections and was later overturned in court. The proposition was created by opponents of same-sex marriage in advance of the California Supreme Court's May 2008 appeal ruling, In re Marriage Cases, which followed the short-lived 2004 same-sex weddings controversy and found the previous ban on same-sex marriage (Proposition 22, 2000) unconstitutional. Proposition 8 was ultimately ruled unconstitutional by a federal court (on different grounds) in 2010, although the court decision did not go into effect until June 26, 2013, following the conclusion of proponents' appeals."@en . . "Proposition 8 (in italiano: Proposizione 8) \u00E8 il nome dato al referendum tenutosi in California il 4 novembre 2008 in cui si chiedeva l'abolizione del diritto al matrimonio tra persone dello stesso sesso, introdotto da una sentenza della Corte Suprema della California del 15 maggio 2008. La proposizione chiedeva inoltre di inserire un emendamento nella costituzione della California per affermare che lo Stato riconosce come valido solo il matrimonio tra un uomo e una donna."@it . . . . . . . "Proposition 8 (\u00C5ttonde f\u00F6rslaget) kallades det f\u00F6rslag till till\u00E4gg i Kaliforniens grundlag om att \"enbart gifterm\u00E5l mellan en man och en kvinna \u00E4r giltiga och erk\u00E4nns av staten Kalifornien\", som framlades av Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J Knight, Martin F Guiterrez, Hak-Shing William Tam och Mark A Jansson och segrade i en folkomr\u00F6stning som genomf\u00F6rdes samtidigt med presidentvalet i USA 2008."@sv . . "97.52"^^ . . . . . "\u041F\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043B\u043E\u0436\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 8 (\u0430\u043D\u0433\u043B. Proposition 8) \u2014 \u043D\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u043A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043E\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u043F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0438 \u0448\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u041A\u0430\u043B\u0438\u0444\u043E\u0440\u043D\u0438\u0438, \u043A\u043E\u0442\u043E\u0440\u0430\u044F \u0431\u044B\u043B\u0430 \u043F\u0440\u0438\u043D\u044F\u0442\u0430 \u043D\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0444\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043D\u0434\u0443\u043C\u0435 4 \u043D\u043E\u044F\u0431\u0440\u044F 2008 \u0433\u043E\u0434\u0430. \u042D\u0442\u0430 \u043F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0430 \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043B\u0430 \u043D\u0430 \u0442\u0435\u0440\u0440\u0438\u0442\u043E\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u041A\u0430\u043B\u0438\u0444\u043E\u0440\u043D\u0438\u0438 \u0438 \u043E\u043F\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043B\u044F\u043B\u0430 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A \u043A\u0430\u043A \u00AB\u0441\u043E\u044E\u0437 \u043C\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u043C\u0443\u0436\u0447\u0438\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u0438 \u0436\u0435\u043D\u0449\u0438\u043D\u043E\u0439\u00BB \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043A\u043B\u044E\u0447\u0430\u043B\u0430 \u043E\u0434\u043D\u043E\u043F\u043E\u043B\u044B\u0439 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A. \u0417\u0430 \u043F\u0440\u0438\u043D\u044F\u0442\u0438\u0435 \u043F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0438 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0433\u043E\u043B\u043E\u0441\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043B\u0438 52,5 % \u0438\u043C\u0435\u044E\u0449\u0438\u0445 \u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043E \u0433\u043E\u043B\u043E\u0441\u0430 \u0438 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0442\u0438\u0432 \u2014 47,5 %. \u041F\u043E\u0441\u043B\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0444\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043D\u0434\u0443\u043C\u0430 \u0432 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044C\u044E 1 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0434\u0435\u043B 7.5 \u041A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u041A\u0430\u043B\u0438\u0444\u043E\u0440\u043D\u0438\u0438 \u0431\u044B\u043B\u0430 \u0432\u043D\u0435\u0441\u0435\u043D\u0430 \u043F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0430:"@ru . "13743177"^^ . . . . . . . . "La Proposici\u00F3n 8 fue un refer\u00E9ndum en las elecciones estatales de California, Estados Unidos, que elimin\u00F3 el derecho de las parejas del mismo sexo a contraer matrimonio.\u200B\u200B La aprobaci\u00F3n de la proposici\u00F3n modific\u00F3 la Constituci\u00F3n de California, eliminando el derecho de las parejas del mismo sexo a contraer matrimonio.\u200B Adicionalmente, se a\u00F1adi\u00F3 una secci\u00F3n en la constituci\u00F3n declarando que \"s\u00F3lo el matrimonio entre un hombre y una mujer es v\u00E1lido o reconocido en California,\" pretendiendo revocar la decisi\u00F3n previa del Tribunal Supremo del estado que legaliz\u00F3 el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo.\u200B La medida fue presentada para las elecciones estatales en noviembre titulada \"Ley de Protecci\u00F3n del Matrimonio en California\".\u200B El t\u00EDtulo y el resumen fueron revisados por el fiscal general Jerry Brown para que todo fuese m\u00E1s \"exacto y claro.\"\u200B El Tribunal Supremo de California fall\u00F3 a favor de estos cambios, declarando que, \"El t\u00EDtulo y el resumen no eran falsos o enga\u00F1osos, ya que se afirmaban que la Proposici\u00F3n 8 \"eliminaba el derecho de las parejas del mismo sexo a contraer matrimonio\" en California. El Tribunal Supremo de California hab\u00EDa sostenido anteriormente de manera inequ\u00EDvoca que las parejas del mismo sexo ten\u00EDan el derecho constitucional a contraer matrimonio en virtud de la Constituci\u00F3n de California\".\u200B El 26 de junio la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos finalmente dio su veredicto desestimando la proposici\u00F3n 8, volviendo a ser legal el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en California.\u200B El 28 de junio de 2013, el tribunal federal de apelaciones del noveno circuito judicial levant\u00F3 el bloqueo existente sobre la celebraci\u00F3n de bodas homosexuales en California, tras la decisi\u00F3n de la Corte Suprema.\u200B"@es . . . "187595"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "No"@en . . . . . . "7001084"^^ . "Proposition 8"@en . "A Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 \u00E9 uma iniciativa que decorreu na Calif\u00F3rnia a 4 de Novembro de 2008 que baniu o casamento de indiv\u00EDduos do mesmo sexo. A medida foi aprovada com 52,24 por cento de votos a favor, alterando a Constitui\u00E7\u00E3o do Estado da Calif\u00F3rnia ao adicionar uma sec\u00E7\u00E3o que afirma que \"apenas o casamento entre um homem e uma mulher \u00E9 v\u00E1lido ou reconhecido na Calif\u00F3rnia\". A lei foi uma resposta a uma declara\u00E7\u00E3o de um juiz que defendia que o casamento homossexual era legal segundo a Constitui\u00E7\u00E3o do Estado da Calif\u00F3rnia. A campanha para aprovar a Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 foi principalmente paga pela Igreja de Jesus Cristo dos Santos dos \u00DAltimos Dias."@pt . . . . "California"@en . . . "La proposition 8 est un r\u00E9f\u00E9rendum de novembre 2008 visant \u00E0 interdire le mariage entre personnes de m\u00EAme sexe dans l'\u00C9tat am\u00E9ricain de Californie, et inscrit le lendemain de son approbation dans la loi, constituant de fait un amendement de la Constitution de la Californie."@fr . . "\u041F\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043B\u043E\u0436\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 8 (\u0430\u043D\u0433\u043B. Proposition 8) \u2014 \u043D\u0430\u0437\u0432\u0430\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u043A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043E\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u043F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0438 \u0448\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u041A\u0430\u043B\u0438\u0444\u043E\u0440\u043D\u0438\u0438, \u043A\u043E\u0442\u043E\u0440\u0430\u044F \u0431\u044B\u043B\u0430 \u043F\u0440\u0438\u043D\u044F\u0442\u0430 \u043D\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0444\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043D\u0434\u0443\u043C\u0435 4 \u043D\u043E\u044F\u0431\u0440\u044F 2008 \u0433\u043E\u0434\u0430. \u042D\u0442\u0430 \u043F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0430 \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043B\u0430 \u043D\u0430 \u0442\u0435\u0440\u0440\u0438\u0442\u043E\u0440\u0438\u0438 \u041A\u0430\u043B\u0438\u0444\u043E\u0440\u043D\u0438\u0438 \u0438 \u043E\u043F\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043B\u044F\u043B\u0430 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A \u043A\u0430\u043A \u00AB\u0441\u043E\u044E\u0437 \u043C\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u043C\u0443\u0436\u0447\u0438\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u0438 \u0436\u0435\u043D\u0449\u0438\u043D\u043E\u0439\u00BB \u0438 \u0438\u0441\u043A\u043B\u044E\u0447\u0430\u043B\u0430 \u043E\u0434\u043D\u043E\u043F\u043E\u043B\u044B\u0439 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A. \u0417\u0430 \u043F\u0440\u0438\u043D\u044F\u0442\u0438\u0435 \u043F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0438 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0433\u043E\u043B\u043E\u0441\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043B\u0438 52,5 % \u0438\u043C\u0435\u044E\u0449\u0438\u0445 \u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043E \u0433\u043E\u043B\u043E\u0441\u0430 \u0438 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0442\u0438\u0432 \u2014 47,5 %. \u041F\u043E\u0441\u043B\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0444\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043D\u0434\u0443\u043C\u0430 \u0432 \u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044C\u044E 1 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u0434\u0435\u043B 7.5 \u041A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u041A\u0430\u043B\u0438\u0444\u043E\u0440\u043D\u0438\u0438 \u0431\u044B\u043B\u0430 \u0432\u043D\u0435\u0441\u0435\u043D\u0430 \u043F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0430: \u00ABOnly marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.(\u0422\u043E\u043B\u044C\u043A\u043E \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A \u043C\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0443 \u043C\u0443\u0436\u0447\u0438\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u0438 \u0436\u0435\u043D\u0449\u0438\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u0434\u0435\u0439\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043B\u0435\u043D \u0438 \u043F\u0440\u0438\u0437\u043D\u0430\u0451\u0442\u0441\u044F \u0432 \u041A\u0430\u043B\u0438\u0444\u043E\u0440\u043D\u0438\u0438)\u00BB. \u0412 2009 \u0433\u043E\u0434\u0443 \u0443\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0434\u0438\u043B \u0440\u0435\u0437\u0443\u043B\u044C\u0442\u0430\u0442\u044B \u0440\u0435\u0444\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043D\u0434\u0443\u043C\u0430. \u041F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0430 8 \u0431\u044B\u043B\u0430 \u043E\u0441\u043F\u043E\u0440\u0435\u043D\u0430 \u0441\u0442\u043E\u0440\u043E\u043D\u043D\u0438\u043A\u0430\u043C\u0438 \u043E\u0434\u043D\u043E\u043F\u043E\u043B\u044B\u0445 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u043E\u0432. \u0412 2010 \u0433\u043E\u0434\u0443 \u0424\u0435\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0430\u043B\u044C\u043D\u044B\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434 \u0421\u0428\u0410 \u043F\u0440\u0438\u043D\u044F\u043B \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u043E \u043D\u0435\u0437\u0430\u043A\u043E\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u041F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0438 8. \u0421\u0442\u043E\u0440\u043E\u043D\u043D\u0438\u043A\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u043F\u0440\u0435\u0442\u0430 \u043E\u0434\u043D\u043E\u043F\u043E\u043B\u044B\u0445 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u043E\u0432 \u043E\u043F\u0440\u043E\u0442\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043B\u0438 \u0434\u0430\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0435 \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435, \u043D\u043E \u0410\u043F\u0435\u043B\u043B\u044F\u0446\u0438\u043E\u043D\u043D\u044B\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434 \u043F\u0440\u0438\u0437\u043D\u0430\u043B \u041F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0443 8 \u043D\u0435\u043A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043E\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0439. \u041F\u043E\u0441\u043B\u0435 \u044D\u0442\u043E\u0433\u043E \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u043D\u0438\u043A\u0438 \u041F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0438 \u043E\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0442\u0438\u043B\u0438\u0441\u044C \u0432 \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043E\u0432\u043D\u044B\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434. 26 \u0438\u044E\u043D\u044F 2013 \u0433\u043E\u0434\u0430 \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043E\u0432\u043D\u044B\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434 \u0421\u0428\u0410 \u043E\u0442\u043A\u043B\u043E\u043D\u0438\u043B \u0430\u043F\u0435\u043B\u043B\u044F\u0446\u0438\u044E \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u043D\u0438\u043A\u043E\u0432 \u041F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0438 8, \u043C\u043E\u0442\u0438\u0432\u0438\u0440\u0443\u044F \u044D\u0442\u043E \u0442\u0435\u043C, \u0447\u0442\u043E \u0443 \u043D\u0438\u0445 \u043D\u0435\u0434\u043E\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0451\u0442 \u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043E\u0432\u044B\u0445 \u043E\u0441\u043D\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043D\u0438\u0439 (\u0430\u043D\u0433\u043B. standing), \u0447\u0442\u043E\u0431\u044B \u043E\u0441\u043F\u0430\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044C \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u0410\u043F\u0435\u043B\u043B\u044F\u0446\u0438\u043E\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0433\u043E \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430 \u0432 \u0412\u044B\u0441\u0448\u0435\u043C \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0435. \u00AB\u041C\u044B \u043D\u0438\u043A\u043E\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u043F\u0440\u0435\u0436\u0434\u0435 \u043D\u0435 \u043F\u043E\u0434\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0434\u0430\u043B\u0438, \u0447\u0442\u043E \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443\u044E\u0442 \u043E\u0441\u043D\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043D\u0438\u044F \u0447\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u0441\u0442\u043E\u0440\u043E\u043D\u044B \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0449\u0430\u0442\u044C \u043A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043E\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0441\u0442\u044C \u0437\u0430\u043A\u043E\u043D\u0430 \u0448\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0430, \u043A\u043E\u0433\u0434\u0430 \u0432\u043B\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0448\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043F\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043F\u043E\u0447\u043B\u0438 \u043D\u0435 \u0434\u0435\u043B\u0430\u0442\u044C \u044D\u0442\u043E\u0433\u043E, \u2014 \u0437\u0430\u044F\u0432\u0438\u043B \u0433\u043B\u0430\u0432\u043D\u044B\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u044C\u044F \u0414\u0436\u043E\u043D \u0420\u043E\u0431\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0441. \u2014 \u041C\u044B \u043E\u0442\u043A\u0430\u0437\u044B\u0432\u0430\u0435\u043C\u0441\u044F \u0434\u0435\u043B\u0430\u0442\u044C \u044D\u0442\u043E \u0442\u0430\u043A\u0436\u0435 \u0432 \u0434\u0430\u043D\u043D\u043E\u043C \u0441\u043B\u0443\u0447\u0430\u0435\u00BB. \u0412 \u043E\u0442\u0441\u0443\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0438\u0435 \u0434\u043E\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0442\u043E\u0447\u043D\u044B\u0445 \u043E\u0441\u043D\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043D\u0438\u0439 \u0434\u043B\u044F \u0430\u043F\u0435\u043B\u043B\u044F\u0446\u0438\u0438 \u0441\u0443\u0434 \u043D\u0435 \u0438\u043C\u0435\u0435\u0442 \u043F\u043E\u043B\u043D\u043E\u043C\u043E\u0447\u0438\u0439 \u0440\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043C\u0430\u0442\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0430\u0442\u044C \u0434\u0435\u043B\u043E \u043F\u043E \u0441\u0443\u0449\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0432\u0443. \u0422\u0430\u043A\u0438\u043C \u043E\u0431\u0440\u0430\u0437\u043E\u043C, \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u0410\u043F\u0435\u043B\u043B\u044F\u0446\u0438\u043E\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0433\u043E \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430 \u043E \u043D\u0435\u043A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043E\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u041F\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043A\u0438 8 \u0431\u044B\u043B\u043E \u043E\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u043B\u0435\u043D\u043E \u0432 \u0441\u0438\u043B\u0435. \u0412 \u044D\u0442\u043E\u043C \u0432\u043E\u043F\u0440\u043E\u0441\u0435 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u044C\u044E \u0414\u0436\u043E\u043D\u0430 \u0420\u043E\u0431\u0435\u0440\u0442\u0441\u0430 \u043F\u043E\u0434\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0436\u0430\u043B\u0438 \u0442\u0440\u043E\u0435 \u043B\u0438\u0431\u0435\u0440\u0430\u043B\u044C\u043D\u044B\u0445 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0439 \u0420\u0443\u0442 \u0411\u0435\u0439\u0434\u0435\u0440 \u0413\u0438\u043D\u0437\u0431\u0443\u0440\u0433, \u0421\u0442\u0438\u0432\u0435\u043D \u0411\u0440\u0435\u0439\u0435\u0440, \u0415\u043B\u0435\u043D\u0430 \u041A\u0430\u0433\u0430\u043D \u0438 \u043A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043D\u044B\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u044C\u044F \u0410\u043D\u0442\u043E\u043D\u0438\u043D \u0421\u043A\u0430\u043B\u0438\u044F. \u0421\u0443\u0434\u044C\u044F \u042D\u043D\u0442\u043E\u043D\u0438 \u041A\u0435\u043D\u043D\u0435\u0434\u0438, \u043A\u043E\u0442\u043E\u0440\u044B\u0439 \u043F\u0438\u0441\u0430\u043B \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u043E \u043D\u0435\u043A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043E\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0417\u0430\u043A\u043E\u043D\u0430 \u043E \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u0430, \u0432\u044B\u0440\u0430\u0437\u0438\u043B \u043E\u0441\u043E\u0431\u043E\u0435 \u043C\u043D\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u043E \u0442\u043E\u043C, \u0447\u0442\u043E \u0441\u0443\u0434 \u043C\u043E\u0436\u0435\u0442 \u0440\u0430\u0441\u0441\u043C\u043E\u0442\u0440\u0435\u0442\u044C \u0432\u043E\u043F\u0440\u043E\u0441 \u043E\u0431 \u043E\u0434\u043D\u043E\u043F\u043E\u043B\u044B\u0445 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u0430\u0445 \u0442\u043E\u0436\u0435. \u041A \u043D\u0435\u043C\u0443 \u043F\u0440\u0438\u0441\u043E\u0435\u0434\u0438\u043D\u0438\u043B\u0438\u0441\u044C \u043A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0435\u0440\u0432\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043D\u044B\u0435 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u044C\u044F \u0421\u0430\u043C\u0443\u044D\u043B \u0410\u043B\u0438\u0442\u043E \u0438 \u041A\u043B\u0435\u0439\u0440\u0435\u043D\u0441 \u0422\u043E\u043C\u0430\u0441 \u0432\u043C\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0435 \u0441 \u043B\u0438\u0431\u0435\u0440\u0430\u043B\u044C\u043D\u043E\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u044C\u0451\u0439 \u0421\u043E\u043D\u0435\u0439 \u0421\u043E\u0442\u043E\u043C\u0430\u0439\u043E\u0440, \u043A\u043E\u0442\u043E\u0440\u044B\u0435 \u0441\u043E\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043B\u0438 \u043C\u0435\u043D\u044C\u0448\u0438\u043D\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043E. \u041E\u043D\u0438 \u0437\u0430\u044F\u0432\u0438\u043B\u0438, \u0447\u0442\u043E \u0437\u0430\u043A\u043E\u043D\u043E\u0434\u0430\u0442\u0435\u043B\u044C\u043D\u0430\u044F \u0438\u043D\u0438\u0446\u0438\u0430\u0442\u0438\u0432\u0430 \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0435\u0431\u043D\u043E\u0433\u043E \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0446\u0435\u0441\u0441\u0430 \u043D\u0435\u0433\u043E\u0434\u043D\u0430\u044F, \u0435\u0441\u043B\u0438 \u0432\u043B\u0430\u0441\u0442\u0438 \u0448\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0430 \u043C\u043E\u0433\u0443\u0442 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0441\u0442\u043E \u043E\u0442\u043A\u0430\u0437\u0430\u0442\u044C\u0441\u044F \u043E\u0431\u0435\u0441\u043F\u0435\u0447\u0438\u0442\u044C \u043F\u0440\u0430\u0432\u043E\u0432\u043E\u0439 \u0441\u0430\u043D\u043A\u0446\u0438\u0435\u0439 \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435, \u0437\u0430 \u043A\u043E\u0442\u043E\u0440\u043E\u0435 \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0433\u043E\u043B\u043E\u0441\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043B\u0438 \u043B\u044E\u0434\u0438. \u0412 \u0442\u043E \u0432\u0440\u0435\u043C\u044F \u043A\u0430\u043A \u0441\u0442\u043E\u0440\u043E\u043D\u043D\u0438\u043A\u0438 \u043E\u0434\u043D\u043E\u043F\u043E\u043B\u044B\u0445 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u043E\u0432 \u043F\u0440\u0438\u0432\u0435\u0442\u0441\u0442\u0432\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043B\u0438 \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043E\u0432\u043D\u043E\u0433\u043E \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430 \u043A\u0430\u043A \u0441\u0432\u043E\u044E \u043F\u043E\u0431\u0435\u0434\u0443, \u043F\u0440\u043E\u0442\u0438\u0432\u043D\u0438\u043A\u0438 \u043E\u0434\u043D\u043E\u043F\u043E\u043B\u044B\u0445 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u043E\u0432 \u0431\u044B\u043B\u0438 \u0443\u0434\u043E\u0432\u043B\u0435\u0442\u0432\u043E\u0440\u0435\u043D\u044B \u0442\u0435\u043C, \u0447\u0442\u043E \u0412\u0435\u0440\u0445\u043E\u0432\u043D\u044B\u0439 \u0441\u0443\u0434 \u043E\u0441\u0442\u0430\u0432\u0438\u043B \u0432\u043E\u043F\u0440\u043E\u0441 \u043E\u043F\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043B\u0435\u043D\u0438\u044F \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u0430 \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0430\u0442\u044C \u043A\u0430\u0436\u0434\u043E\u043C\u0443 \u0448\u0442\u0430\u0442\u0443 \u0441\u0430\u043C\u043E\u0441\u0442\u043E\u044F\u0442\u0435\u043B\u044C\u043D\u043E, \u0430 \u043D\u0435 \u0443\u0442\u0432\u0435\u0440\u0434\u0438\u043B \u043A\u043E\u043D\u0441\u0442\u0438\u0442\u0443\u0446\u0438\u043E\u043D\u043D\u043E\u0441\u0442\u044C \u043E\u0434\u043D\u043E\u043F\u043E\u043B\u044B\u0445 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u043E\u0432. \u0422\u0430\u043A, \u043F\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043D\u0442 Family Research Council \u0422\u043E\u043D\u0438 \u041F\u0435\u0440\u043A\u0435\u043D\u0441 \u0437\u0430\u044F\u0432\u0438\u043B: \u00AB\u0425\u043E\u0442\u044F \u043C\u044B \u0438 \u0440\u0430\u0437\u043E\u0447\u0430\u0440\u043E\u0432\u0430\u043D\u044B \u0440\u0435\u0448\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435\u043C \u0441\u0443\u0434\u0430 \u043E\u0442\u043C\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0442\u044C \u0444\u0435\u0434\u0435\u0440\u0430\u043B\u044C\u043D\u044B\u0439 \u0417\u0430\u043A\u043E\u043D \u043E \u0437\u0430\u0449\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u0430, \u0441\u0443\u0434 \u0441\u0435\u0433\u043E\u0434\u043D\u044F \u043D\u0435 \u043D\u0430\u0432\u044F\u0437\u0430\u043B \u043F\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043E\u043F\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043B\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 \u043F\u0440\u0438\u0440\u043E\u0434\u044B \u0431\u0440\u0430\u043A\u0430, \u043A\u043E\u0442\u043E\u0440\u043E\u0433\u043E \u0434\u043E\u0431\u0438\u0432\u0430\u043B\u0438\u0441\u044C, \u043E\u0433\u0443\u043B\u044C\u043D\u043E \u0432 \u043C\u0430\u0441\u0448\u0442\u0430\u0431\u0435 \u0432\u0441\u0435\u0439 \u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043D\u044B\u00BB."@ru . . . . . . "2.48"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Proposition 8 (secara tidak resmi dijuluki Prop 8) adalah inisiatif referendum dan amendemen konstitusi negara bagian Kalifornia yang disetujui selama . Inisiatif ini diprakarsai oleh kelompok yang menentang pernikahan sesama jenis sebelum dikeluarkannya keputusan oleh pada Mei 2008. Keputusan tersebut menyatakan bahwa pelarangan pernikahan sesama jenis dalam tidak konstitusional. Proposition 8 pada akhirnya dinyatakan tidak konstitusional oleh mahkamah federal (dengan alasan yang berbeda) pada tahun 2010, walaupun keputusan pengadilan baru berlaku pada 26 Juni 2013. Dengan diberlakukannya keputusan tersebut, Gubernur Jerry Brown dapat meneruskan pernikahan sesama jenis di Kalifornia."@in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Propozycja 8 w Kalifornii w 2008 roku, (ang. Proposition 8) \u2013 propozycja poprawki konstytucyjnej w ameryka\u0144skim stanie Kalifornia, nad kt\u00F3r\u0105 obywatele tego stanu g\u0142osowali w referendum 4 listopada 2008 roku. Propozycja ta sprecyzowa\u0142a obowi\u0105zuj\u0105c\u0105 w Kalifornii definicj\u0119 zwi\u0105zku ma\u0142\u017Ce\u0144skiego jako zwi\u0105zku \"mi\u0119dzy m\u0119\u017Cczyzn\u0105 i kobiet\u0105\", eliminuj\u0105c prawo par tej samej p\u0142ci do zawierania ma\u0142\u017Ce\u0144stw. Wed\u0142ug wst\u0119pnych wynik\u00F3w, za poprawk\u0105 g\u0142osowa\u0142o ok. 52,5% uprawnionych do g\u0142osowania, przeciw - oko\u0142o 47,5%. Po wej\u015Bciu w \u017Cycie propozycji do artyku\u0142u I Konstytucji Kalifornii zosta\u0142a dodana sekcja 7.5 w brzmieniu: Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.Tylko ma\u0142\u017Ce\u0144stwo mi\u0119dzy m\u0119\u017Cczyzn\u0105 i kobiet\u0105 jest wa\u017Cne i uznawane w Kalifornii. Legalno\u015B\u0107 poprawki zosta\u0142a potwierdzona wyrokiem S\u0105du Najwy\u017Cszego Kalifornii w 2009. W 2013 S\u0105d Najwy\u017Cszy Stan\u00F3w Zjednoczonych uzna\u0142 Propozycj\u0119 8 za niezgodn\u0105 z Konstytucj\u0105 Stan\u00F3w Zjednoczonych, a przez to niewa\u017Cn\u0105."@pl . . . . . . "Proposition 8 (in italiano: Proposizione 8) \u00E8 il nome dato al referendum tenutosi in California il 4 novembre 2008 in cui si chiedeva l'abolizione del diritto al matrimonio tra persone dello stesso sesso, introdotto da una sentenza della Corte Suprema della California del 15 maggio 2008. La proposizione chiedeva inoltre di inserire un emendamento nella costituzione della California per affermare che lo Stato riconosce come valido solo il matrimonio tra un uomo e una donna. Al referendum il 52,24% degli aventi diritto ha votato a favore della proposizione, provocando cos\u00EC l'abolizione di fatto del diritto di matrimonio per le coppie dello stesso sesso e limitando l'accesso al matrimonio solo a coppie formate da un uomo e una donna, con decorrenza dal 5 novembre 2008. In seguito all'approvazione della Proposition 8 \u00E8 stato presentato un nuovo ricorso alla Corte Suprema della California perch\u00E9 l'iniziativa fosse dichiarata costituzionalmente illegittima. Secondo le organizzazioni a favore del matrimonio egalitario infatti il diritto di sposarsi \u00E8 inalienabile ed essenzialmente appartenente ad ogni essere umano, e in quanto tale non pu\u00F2 essere messo ai voti n\u00E9 annullato da un referendum. Il 26 maggio 2009 la Corte ha per\u00F2 respinto il ricorso poich\u00E9 l'emendamento era parte integrante della costituzione californiana; non erano quindi pi\u00F9 validi i principi usati dalla stessa Corte nella sentenza \"In re Marriage Cases\", con i quali il tribunale supremo aveva aperto il matrimonio anche alle coppie dello stesso sesso. Poich\u00E9 le corti statali non avevano pi\u00F9 giurisdizione in materia, le battaglie legali si sono trasferite nei tribunali federali. E nell'agosto del 2010 la Corte distrettuale di San Francisco ha bocciato la proposizione ritenendola \u00ABdiscriminatoria\u00BB e contraria ai principi sanciti dal Quattordicesimo Emendamento della Costituzione degli Stati Uniti. L'amministrazione statale accett\u00F2 subito la sentenza, ma la Corte d'Appello per il Nono Circuito intervenne sospendendo il giudizio del tribunale distrettuale. La Corte d'Appello, il 7 febbraio 2012, espresse il suo giudizio sulla Proposition 8 riaffermando il giudizio del tribunale distrettuale, in un voto 2-1. L'opinione di maggioranza infatti ha ritenuto che il popolo della California non poteva limitare i diritti di una minoranza attraverso un emendamento costituzionale poich\u00E9 ci\u00F2 andava in contrasto con la costituzione federale. La decisione \u00E8 stata comunque sospesa ed eseguito un ultimo ricorso, stavolta alla Corte Suprema degli Stati Uniti. L'intera vicenda si \u00E8 quindi conclusa il 26 giugno 2013, quando la Corte Suprema ha respinto il ricorso presentato affermando che n\u00E9 la Corte stessa n\u00E9 la Corte d'Appello avevano giurisdizione in materia. Pertanto il giudizio torn\u00F2 al tribunale distrettuale, che lo riafferm\u00F2, aprendo definitivamente il matrimonio tra persone dello stesso sesso nello stato della California."@it . . . . . . . . "2008 California Proposition 8"@en . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "1124735191"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Eliminates Rights of Same-Sex Couples to Marry. Initiative Constitutional Amendment"@en . . . . "#fff"@en . . "#feda00"@en . . . "17450998"^^ . . . . . "La proposition 8 est un r\u00E9f\u00E9rendum de novembre 2008 visant \u00E0 interdire le mariage entre personnes de m\u00EAme sexe dans l'\u00C9tat am\u00E9ricain de Californie, et inscrit le lendemain de son approbation dans la loi, constituant de fait un amendement de la Constitution de la Californie. \u00C0 cette fin, cette proposition affirme que seul le mariage entre un homme et une femme est reconnu en Californie, et vise \u00E0 renverser la d\u00E9cision de la Cour supr\u00EAme de Californie autorisant le mariage entre personnes de m\u00EAme sexe. Approuv\u00E9e par les \u00E9lecteurs le 4 novembre 2008 avec 52,24 % des suffrages, elle est d\u00E9clar\u00E9e non conforme \u00E0 la Constitution des \u00C9tats-Unis (notamment au XIVe amendement) en ao\u00FBt 2010 par le juge f\u00E9d\u00E9ral . Cependant, le mariage entre personnes de m\u00EAme sexe reste suspendu dans l\u2019\u00C9tat, et sa validit\u00E9 \u00E0 long terme devra vraisemblablement \u00EAtre \u00E9valu\u00E9e par la Cour supr\u00EAme des \u00C9tats-Unis. Le 26 juin 2013, la Cour supr\u00EAme des \u00C9tats-Unis juge que le groupe de d\u00E9fenseurs de la proposition 8 qui porte le dossier n'\u00E9tait pas l\u00E9galement habilit\u00E9 \u00E0 le faire et l'annule. La cour d'appel l\u00E8ve donc la suspension, permettant aux mariages de reprendre sans d\u00E9lai en Californie."@fr . . . . . . . . . . "Proposition 8 was een referendum (ballot proposition) en staatsgrondwettelijk amendement in de Amerikaanse deelstaat Californi\u00EB dat op 4 november 2008 werd aangenomen door de kiezers van die staat. Onder Proposition 8 werd er een regel toegevoegd aan de grondwet van Californi\u00EB, waarin gesteld wordt dat \"alleen een huwelijk tussen een man en een vrouw geldig of erkend is in Californi\u00EB.\" Daarmee werd er een eind gemaakt aan het grondwettelijke recht van homoseksuele partners om te huwen, een recht dat zij door de uitspraak van de zaak op 15 mei 2008 voor het Hooggerechtshof van Californi\u00EB verworven hadden. Proposition 8 had geen invloed op domestic partnerships in Californi\u00EB en liet ook homohuwelijken uitgevoerd voor 5 november 2008 ongemoeid. De goedkeuring van het voorstel door 52,24% van de Californische kiezers zorgde voor protestacties en demonstraties in Californi\u00EB en over het hele land. Er volgden ook verschillende rechtszaken. Rechter van de maakte Proposition 8 op 4 augustus 2010 ongedaan in de zaak omdat het niet in overeenstemming was met de voorzieningen op rechtszekerheid en gelijke behandeling in de Amerikaanse grondwet. Walker legde een bevel op tegen het uitvoeren van Proposition 8, maar liet ook het herinvoeren van het homohuwelijk uitstellen om te bepalen wat er moest gebeuren in afwachting van hoger beroep. Op 7 februari 2012 besliste het Hof van Beroep voor het 9e circuit dat het verbod op het homohuwelijk inderdaad ongrondwettelijk was. Desalniettemin behielden de rechters het uitstel op het herinvoeren van het homohuwelijk. Op 5 juni 2012 verwierp het gerechtshof een verzoek om de zaak en banc te herzien. Voorstanders van Proposition 8 dienden daarop bij het federale Hooggerechtshof een verzoek tot certiorari in, een bevelschrift tot revisie van een vonnis, en op 7 december 2012 keurde het hof dat voorstel goed. Op 26 juni 2013 deed het Hooggerechtshof uitspraak in de zaak Hollingsworth v. Perry en oordeelde met vijf stemmen tegen vier dat het verzoek van de indieners geen betrekking had op een werkelijk geschil en verwees de zaak terug naar het Hof van Beroep voor het 9e circuit met instructies het beroep wegens gebrek aan rechtsmacht ongegrond te verklaren."@nl . . . . . . . "Proposition 8"@sv . "Proposition 8 (secara tidak resmi dijuluki Prop 8) adalah inisiatif referendum dan amendemen konstitusi negara bagian Kalifornia yang disetujui selama . Inisiatif ini diprakarsai oleh kelompok yang menentang pernikahan sesama jenis sebelum dikeluarkannya keputusan oleh pada Mei 2008. Keputusan tersebut menyatakan bahwa pelarangan pernikahan sesama jenis dalam tidak konstitusional. Proposition 8 pada akhirnya dinyatakan tidak konstitusional oleh mahkamah federal (dengan alasan yang berbeda) pada tahun 2010, walaupun keputusan pengadilan baru berlaku pada 26 Juni 2013. Dengan diberlakukannya keputusan tersebut, Gubernur Jerry Brown dapat meneruskan pernikahan sesama jenis di Kalifornia."@in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "\u52A0\u5229\u798F\u5C3C\u4E9A\u5DDE8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848 (2008\u5E74)"@zh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "6401482"^^ . . "Proposition 8"@de . . "7001084"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . "79.42"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Source: California Secretary of State"@en . . . . . . . . "8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\uFF08\u82F1\u6587\uFF1AProposition 8\uFF0C\u7B80\u5199\u4E3AProp 8\uFF09\u662F\u7F8E\u56FD\u52A0\u5229\u798F\u5C3C\u4E9A\u5DDE2008\u5E7411\u6708\u7684\u4E00\u9879\u5DDE\u5BAA\u6CD5\u4FEE\u6B63\u6295\u7968\u63D0\u6848\u3002 \u8BE5\u63D0\u6848\u81F4\u529B\u4E8E\u5C06\u52A0\u5229\u798F\u5C3C\u4E9A\u5DDE\u5185\u5A5A\u59FB\u5173\u7CFB\u7684\u5B9A\u4E49\u4EC5\u9650\u5B9A\u4E8E\u5F02\u6027\u4E4B\u95F4\uFF0C\u4ECE\u800C\u5426\u5B9A\u540C\u6027\u5A5A\u59FB\u3002\u7531\u4E8E8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u4ECE\u6839\u672C\u4E0A\u6539\u53D8\u4E86\u52A0\u5DDE\u5BAA\u6CD5\u5BF9\u5A5A\u59FB\u7684\u5B9A\u4E49\uFF0C\u56E0\u6B64\u5E9F\u9664\u4E86\u52A0\u5DDE\u6700\u9AD8\u6CD5\u9662\u5728\u4E2D\u7684\u5224\u51B3\u3002\u6839\u636E\u8BE5\u63D0\u6848\uFF0C\u5DDE\u5BAA\u6CD5\u7B2C\u4E00\u6761\uFF08Article I\uFF09\u5C06\u65B0\u589E\u6DFB\u4E00\u6B3E(7.5\u6B3E)\uFF0C\u5176\u5185\u5BB9\u662F\uFF1A\u201C\u5728\u52A0\u5229\u798F\u5C3C\u4E9A\u5DDE\uFF0C\u53EA\u6709\u4E00\u7537\u4E0E\u4E00\u5973\u7684\u5A5A\u59FB\u662F\u5408\u6CD5\u548C\u53D7\u5230\u8BA4\u53EF\u7684\u3002\u201D 2008\u5E7411\u67084\u65E5\uFF0C8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u4EE552%\u7684\u6295\u7968\u7387\u83B7\u5F97\u901A\u8FC7\uFF0C\u5E76\u4E8E\u6B21\u65E5\u6B63\u5F0F\u751F\u6548\u3002\u867D\u7136\u52A0\u5DDE\u653F\u5E9C\u5C06\u4E0D\u518D\u5411\u540C\u6027\u4F34\u4FA3\u7B7E\u53D1\u5A5A\u59FB\u8BC1\u4E66\uFF0C\u4F46\u8BE5\u63D0\u6848\u5E76\u4E0D\u5F71\u54CD\u52A0\u5DDE\u7684\u6C11\u4E8B\u7ED3\u5408\u3002 8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u7684\u652F\u6301\u6D3E\u4E0E\u53CD\u5BF9\u6D3E\u5728\u6295\u7968\u6218\u4E2D\u5404\u82B1\u8D39\u4E863580\u4E07\u7F8E\u5143\u548C3760\u4E07\u7F8E\u5143\uFF0C\u662F\u622A\u81F3\u5F53\u65F6\u5168\u7F8E\u5404\u5DDE\u8D44\u91D1\u6700\u9AD8\u7684\u6295\u7968\u63D0\u6848\uFF0C\u5176\u82B1\u9500\u8D85\u8FC7\u8FC7\u5F80\u9664\u4E86\u603B\u7EDF\u9009\u6218\u5916\u6240\u6709\u7684\u62C9\u7968\u6218\u3002\u652F\u6301\u8005\u575A\u79F0\u53EA\u5E94\u5B58\u5728\u5F02\u6027\u604B\u5A5A\u59FB\uFF0C\u5982\u4E0D\u626D\u8F6C\u6700\u9AD8\u6CD5\u9662\u4E8E2008\u5E745\u6708\u8D77\u627F\u8BA4\u540C\u6027\u5A5A\u59FB\u6743\u5229\u7684\u88C1\u51B3\uFF0C\u5C31\u4F1A\u635F\u5BB3\u793E\u4F1A\uFF0C\u6539\u53D8\u5B66\u6821\u5728\u5A5A\u59FB\u65B9\u9762\u6559\u5BFC\u7684\u5185\u5BB9\uFF0C\u751A\u81F3\u5A01\u80C1\u5230\u5B97\u6559\u81EA\u7531\u3002\u53CD\u5BF9\u8005\u5219\u8BA4\u4E3A\uFF0C\u8BE5\u63D0\u6848\u635F\u5BB3\u4E86\u6240\u6709\u52A0\u5229\u798F\u5C3C\u4E9A\u4EBA\u7684\u6743\u5229\uFF0C\u4E14\u4F7F\u67D0\u4E00\u7279\u5B9A\u4EBA\u7FA4\u53D7\u5230\u4E86\u4E0D\u516C\u5E73\u7684\u5BF9\u5F85\uFF0C\u8FD9\u662F\u4E0D\u516C\u5E73\u4E14\u6781\u7AEF\u9519\u8BEF\u7684\u3002 \u6295\u7968\u7ED3\u679C\u4EA7\u751F\u540E\uFF0C\u52A0\u5DDE\u53CA\u5168\u7F8E\u5176\u5B83\u5730\u65B9\u90FD\u53D1\u751F\u4E86\u6E38\u884C\u4E0E\u6297\u8BAE\u3002\u52A0\u5DDE\u6700\u9AD8\u6CD5\u9662\u63A5\u5230\u4E86\u5927\u91CF\u540C\u6027\u604B\u5BB6\u5EAD\u53CA\u653F\u5E9C\u673A\u6784\u8981\u6C42\u63A8\u7FFB8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u7684\u8BC9\u8BBC\u3002\u4ED6\u4EEC\u5BF9\u63D0\u6848\u7684\u6709\u6548\u6027\u53CA\u5176\u5BF9\u4E4B\u524D\u540C\u6027\u5A5A\u59FB\u7684\u5F71\u54CD\u8868\u8FBE\u5F3A\u70C8\u8D28\u7591\u3002\u52A0\u5DDE\u6700\u9AD8\u6CD5\u9662\u53D7\u7406\u4E86\u8BC9\u8BBC\u4F46\u662F\u6700\u7EC8\u5224\u5B9A8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u5177\u6709\u6CD5\u5B9A\u6548\u5E94\u3002 2010\u5E748\u67084\u65E5\uFF0C\u7F8E\u56FD\u8054\u90A6\u5730\u65B9\u6CD5\u9662\u6CD5\u5B98\u5728\u4E00\u6848\u4E2D\u5224\u5B9A8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u8FDD\u53CD\u4E86\u7F8E\u56FD\u5BAA\u6CD5\u4E2D\u7684\u7B2C\u5341\u56DB\u689D\u4FEE\u6B63\u6848\uFF0C\u56E0\u6B64\u5BA3\u5E038\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u65E0\u6548\u3002 2013\u5E746\u670826\u65E5\uFF0C\u7F8E\u56FD\u6700\u9AD8\u6CD5\u9662\u5BA3\u5E03\u7EC8\u5BA1\u5224\u51B3\uFF0C8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u7684\u652F\u6301\u8005\u4E0D\u5177\u5907\u6CD5\u5F8B\u5730\u4F4D\u5BF9\u5730\u65B9\u6CD5\u9662\u7684\u88C1\u51B3\u63D0\u51FA\u4E0A\u8BC9\uFF0C\u5C06\u52A0\u5229\u798F\u5C3C\u4E9A\u5DDE\u540C\u6027\u5A5A\u59FB\u7981\u4EE4\u53D1\u56DE\u8BE5\u5DDE\u4E0B\u7EA7\u6CD5\u9662\u3002\u6700\u9AD8\u6CD5\u9662\u7684\u51B3\u5B9A\u8BA9\u5730\u65B9\u6CD5\u9662\u7684\u88C1\u51B3\u4E3A8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u7684\u6700\u7EC8\u88C1\u51B3\u30026\u670828\u65E5\uFF0C\u7F8E\u56FD\u8054\u90A6\u7B2C\u4E5D\u5DE1\u56DE\u4E0A\u8BC9\u6CD5\u9662\u9A73\u56DE8\u53F7\u63D0\u6848\u652F\u6301\u8005\u7684\u4E0A\u8BC9\uFF0C\u52A0\u5DDE\u6062\u590D\u540C\u6027\u5A5A\u59FB\u767B\u8BB0\u3002"@zh . . . . "Proposition 8"@en . . . . . "Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 da Calif\u00F3rnia (2008)"@pt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "A Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 \u00E9 uma iniciativa que decorreu na Calif\u00F3rnia a 4 de Novembro de 2008 que baniu o casamento de indiv\u00EDduos do mesmo sexo. A medida foi aprovada com 52,24 por cento de votos a favor, alterando a Constitui\u00E7\u00E3o do Estado da Calif\u00F3rnia ao adicionar uma sec\u00E7\u00E3o que afirma que \"apenas o casamento entre um homem e uma mulher \u00E9 v\u00E1lido ou reconhecido na Calif\u00F3rnia\". A lei foi uma resposta a uma declara\u00E7\u00E3o de um juiz que defendia que o casamento homossexual era legal segundo a Constitui\u00E7\u00E3o do Estado da Calif\u00F3rnia. A campanha para aprovar a Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 foi principalmente paga pela Igreja de Jesus Cristo dos Santos dos \u00DAltimos Dias. A Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 foi bastante controversa. A 4 de Agosto de 2010, o juiz do Tribunal Distrital dos Estados Unidos fez uma declara\u00E7\u00E3o que a Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 era n\u00E3o-constitucional e deveria ser contrariada. Isto faria o casamento entre indiv\u00EDduos do mesmo sexo legal de novo na Calif\u00F3rnia, contudo, o Juiz Walker emitiu uma ordem de execu\u00E7\u00E3o, para que aqueles que estivessem a favor da Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 pudessem fazer um recurso legal. Em Novembro de 2007, foi apresentada para as elei\u00E7\u00F5es estatais uma medida que estava intitulada como \"Lei de Protec\u00E7\u00E3o do Matrim\u00F3nio na Calif\u00F3rnia\", proposta por Jerry Brown, Procurador Geral do Estado da Calif\u00F3rnia. Ap\u00F3s algum tempo de delibera\u00E7\u00E3o, o Tribunal Supremo do Estado da Calif\u00F3rnia decidiu em favor da adop\u00E7\u00E3o desta medida, afirmando: \"...\u00E9 alegado que a Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 'elimina o direito de casais do mesmo sexo se casarem', na Calif\u00F3rnia. O Tribunal Supremo da Calif\u00F3rnia j\u00E1 havia delimitado de forma inequ\u00EDvoca que [definia que] os casais do mesmo sexo tinham o direito constitucional de se casar sob a Constitui\u00E7\u00E3o da Calif\u00F3rnia.\" A Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8, o nome pelo qual a medida ficou popularmente conhecida, foi um referendo aprovado a 4 de Novembro de 2008 que ocorreu durante as elei\u00E7\u00F5es estatais da Calif\u00F3rnia, eliminando desse modo o direito de dois indiv\u00EDduos do mesmo g\u00E9nero sexual de contra\u00EDrem matrim\u00F3nio, com 52 por cento de votos a favor pela popula\u00E7\u00E3o residente daquele estado. A aprova\u00E7\u00E3o da proposta modificou a Constitui\u00E7\u00E3o do Estado da Calif\u00F3rnia, implementando uma obriga\u00E7\u00E3o que definiu o casamento como a uni\u00E3o entre dois indiv\u00EDduos de sexos opostos. Ademais, foi adicionada a sec\u00E7\u00E3o 7.5 ao Artigo I da mesma Constitui\u00E7\u00E3o que declara que \"apenas o matrim\u00F3nio entre um homem e uma mulher \u00E9 v\u00E1lido e reconhecido na Calif\u00F3rnia\". Dois anos depois, foi apresentada uma proposta que obrigava que todos os indiv\u00EDduos estrangeiros maiores de 14 anos de idade que permanecessem nos Estados Unidos por mais de 30 dias se registassem no governo dos EUA e que tivessem os documentos do registo em sua posse a todo o momento; qualquer viola\u00E7\u00E3o desta norma seria interpretada como um crime de contraven\u00E7\u00E3o federal com direito \u00E0 pris\u00E3o imediata e at\u00E9 mesmo deporta\u00E7\u00E3o. A proposta foi mais tarde convertida em lei por Jan Brewer, governadora do estado do Arizona, a 23 de Abril de 2010, entrando em vigor a partir de 29 de Julho seguinte, apesar dos esfor\u00E7os da ju\u00EDza , da cidade de Phoenix, que ordenou que se suspendessem as cl\u00E1sulas mais controversas da norma que criminalizava a imigra\u00E7\u00E3o. A 11 de Abril de 2011, ap\u00F3s uma peti\u00E7\u00E3o assinada pelo presidente Barack Obama, que havia aberto um processo contra o Estado do Arizona no Tribunal Federal de Phoenix por achar que a lei pudesse prejudicar no\u00E7\u00F5es b\u00E1sicas de justi\u00E7a, o Tribunal de apela\u00E7\u00E3o dos EUA confirmou a suspens\u00E3o das passagens mais controversas da lei de imigra\u00E7\u00E3o do Arizona, que veio a tornar-se na medida mais ampla e estritamente r\u00EDgida alguma vez implantada contra a imigra\u00E7\u00E3o ilegal naquele estado. O recurso do caso foi ao Nono Circuito do Tribunal de Apela\u00E7\u00F5es. A 7 de Fevereiro de 2012, os ju\u00EDzes neste tribunal concordou com o Juiz Walker que a Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 era n\u00E3o-constitucional. Por\u00E9m, eles tamb\u00E9m emitiram uma ordem de execu\u00E7\u00E3o, para que a declara\u00E7\u00E3o deles pudesse chegar ao Tribunal Supremo dos Estados Unidos. Os que estivessem a favor da Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 fizeram um recurso ao Tribunal Supremo a 30 de Julho de 2012. A 7 de Dezembro seguinte, o Tribunal Supremo concordou em julgar o curso. O Tribunal Supremo fez a sua declara\u00E7\u00E3o final sobre o caso em 2013. A 26 de Junho de 2013, o Tribunal Supremo dos Estados Unidos finalmente deu o seu veredicto rejeitando a Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8, voltando a legalizar o casamento entre indiv\u00EDduos do mesmo g\u00E9nero na Calif\u00F3rnia. A 28 de Junho de 2011, o Nono Circuito de Apela\u00E7\u00F5es do Tribunal Federal emitiu um comunicado no qual fez uma cessa\u00E7\u00E3o que suspendia esta decis\u00E3o de banir o casamento homossexual. A 7 de Fevereiro de 2012, os ju\u00EDzes desse tribunal concordaram com o Juiz Walker, que havia institu\u00EDdo uma norma que afirmava que a Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 era inconstitucional e deveria ser derrubada, al\u00E9m de terem tamb\u00E9m publicado uma suspens\u00E3o da execu\u00E7\u00E3o, para que aqueles que estivessem a favor da Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 pudessem recorrer legalmente e que esta norma institu\u00EDda por Walker pudesse ser apresentada ao Tribunal Supremo dos EUA. Aqueles que estavam a favor da Proposi\u00E7\u00E3o 8 fizeram um recurso ao Tribunal Supremo a 30 de Julho de 2012. A 7 de Dezembro seguinte, o Tribunal concordou em julgar o caso, chegando ao veredicto final de legalizar o casamento entre indiv\u00EDduos do mesmo sexo no estado da Calif\u00F3rnia. V\u00E1rias personalidades, quer assumidamente homossexuais ou apoiantes dos direitos dos homossexuais, deram as suas considera\u00E7\u00F5es sobre o t\u00F3pico, tais como Obama, Ben Affleck, Neil Patrick Harris, William Shatner, Kristen Bell, Dax Shepard, Ricky Martin, Ellen DeGeneres, John Stamos, Nick Jonas, Piers Morgan, Nancy Pelosi, Joan Rivers, Jesse Tyler Ferguson, Alyssa Milano, Russel Brand, Wanda Sykes, Adam Lambert, Seth Green e Adam Shankman, que inclusive encenou um musical sobre o assunto na Broadway estrelado por John C. Reilly e Allison Janney que arrecadou cerca de USD 7.5 milh\u00F5es."@pt . . . . "Proposici\u00F3n 8 (California)"@es . "47.76"^^ . . . "Proposition 8 was een referendum (ballot proposition) en staatsgrondwettelijk amendement in de Amerikaanse deelstaat Californi\u00EB dat op 4 november 2008 werd aangenomen door de kiezers van die staat. Onder Proposition 8 werd er een regel toegevoegd aan de grondwet van Californi\u00EB, waarin gesteld wordt dat \"alleen een huwelijk tussen een man en een vrouw geldig of erkend is in Californi\u00EB.\" Daarmee werd er een eind gemaakt aan het grondwettelijke recht van homoseksuele partners om te huwen, een recht dat zij door de uitspraak van de zaak op 15 mei 2008 voor het Hooggerechtshof van Californi\u00EB verworven hadden. Proposition 8 had geen invloed op domestic partnerships in Californi\u00EB en liet ook homohuwelijken uitgevoerd voor 5 november 2008 ongemoeid."@nl . . . . . . . . . . . "Proposition 8"@fr . . . "52.24"^^ . . "17304428"^^ . . . "\u041F\u0440\u0435\u0434\u043B\u043E\u0436\u0435\u043D\u0438\u0435 8"@ru . . . . . "For\n\n\n\n\nAgainst"@en . . "13402566"^^ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "La Proposici\u00F3n 8 fue un refer\u00E9ndum en las elecciones estatales de California, Estados Unidos, que elimin\u00F3 el derecho de las parejas del mismo sexo a contraer matrimonio.\u200B\u200B La aprobaci\u00F3n de la proposici\u00F3n modific\u00F3 la Constituci\u00F3n de California, eliminando el derecho de las parejas del mismo sexo a contraer matrimonio.\u200B Adicionalmente, se a\u00F1adi\u00F3 una secci\u00F3n en la constituci\u00F3n declarando que \"s\u00F3lo el matrimonio entre un hombre y una mujer es v\u00E1lido o reconocido en California,\" pretendiendo revocar la decisi\u00F3n previa del Tribunal Supremo del estado que legaliz\u00F3 el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo.\u200B"@es . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Propozycja 8 w Kalifornii w 2008 roku"@pl . .