This HTML5 document contains 70 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
n17https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n18https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n7https://openjurist.org/894/f2d/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n12https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/535285/united-states-v-james-richard-burton/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n14http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n11https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/894/188/306712/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:United_States_v._Burton
rdfs:label
United States v. Burton
rdfs:comment
United States v. Burton, 894 F.2d 188 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 (1990) is a United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit court decision relating to the open fields doctrine limiting the scope of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Acting on information that the defendant was cultivating marijuana, two members of the Kentucky State Police, without a search warrant, entered on to the defendant's farm in Warren County, Kentucky. In order to enter the property the two officers climbed over two series of fences which had "No Trespassing" signs posted all around them.
foaf:depiction
n14:US-CourtOfAppeals-6thCircuit-Seal.png
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:Warren_County,_Kentucky dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit_cases dbc:1990_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
7636666
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1087845493
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:George_E._Woods dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit dbc:Warren_County,_Kentucky dbr:Search_warrant dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit_cases dbr:Open_fields_doctrine dbr:Federal_Reporter dbr:E.D._Mich. dbr:Cannabis_(drug) dbr:Oliver_v._United_States dbc:1990_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Warren_County,_Kentucky dbr:U.S._Constitution dbr:Defendant dbr:Certiorari dbr:Kentucky_State_Police dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Nathaniel_R._Jones dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbr:Albert_J._Engel_Jr. dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n7:188 n11: n12: n17:scholar_case%3Fcase=1671439573266571663
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0267g2p n18:4wN94 wikidata:Q7893236
dbp:subsequent
0001-03-22
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_U.S._Courts_of_Appeals_case dbt:BBstyle dbt:Ussc dbt:Reflist dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:US-case-law-stub
dbo:thumbnail
n14:US-CourtOfAppeals-6thCircuit-Seal.png?width=300
dbp:joinmajority
Woods
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:arguedate
0001-04-20
dbp:argueyear
1989
dbp:case
17280.0
dbp:citations
17280.0
dbp:court
dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit
dbp:courtlistener
n12:
dbp:courtseal
US-CourtOfAppeals-6thCircuit-Seal.png
dbp:decidedate
0001-01-17
dbp:decideyear
1990
dbp:fullname
United States v. Burton
dbp:judges
Nathaniel R. Jones, Albert J. Engel Jr., George E. Woods
dbp:justia
n11:
dbp:litigants
United States v. Burton
dbp:majority
Engel
dbp:otherSource
Google Scholar OpenJurist
dbp:otherUrl
n7:188 n17:scholar_case%3Fcase=1671439573266571663
dbo:abstract
United States v. Burton, 894 F.2d 188 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 857 (1990) is a United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit court decision relating to the open fields doctrine limiting the scope of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Acting on information that the defendant was cultivating marijuana, two members of the Kentucky State Police, without a search warrant, entered on to the defendant's farm in Warren County, Kentucky. In order to enter the property the two officers climbed over two series of fences which had "No Trespassing" signs posted all around them. Upon discovering large quantities of marijuana being grown, the defendant was arrested and charged with four drug related counts. The defendant was convicted of a lesser included offense, of which he appealed challenging that his Fourth Amendment rights had been violated. The Court of Appeals upheld the conviction, stating that the case was too factually similar to the Supreme Court's ruling in Oliver v. United States to justify exclusion of the evidence. The Court of Appeals stated: The only difference between the cases is that here the police climbed over a fence and a locked gate, whereas in Oliver, the officers went around a locked gate. Given the cited language from Oliver it is evident that this distinction is not of constitutional significance. The same is true of Burton's claim that the police entry onto his land constituted a trespass under Kentucky State law. The Supreme Court, in Oliver, addressed this issue, in the identical context of Kentucky law, observing in the case of open fields, the general rights of property protected by the common law of trespass have little or no relevance to the applicability of the Fourth Amendment.
dbp:concurrence
Jones
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Burton?oldid=1087845493&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
4160
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:United_States_v._Burton