This HTML5 document contains 85 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n18https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n24https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n25https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112115/stewart-organization-inc-v-ricoh-corp/
n21https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/779/643/106515/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n15http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep487/usrep487022/
n8https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/487/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n12https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/487/22/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n22https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/810/1066/355851/
n16https://www.oyez.org/cases/1987/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Stewart_Organization,_Inc._v._Ricoh_Corp.
rdf:type
yago:Case107308889 wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Event100029378 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Happening107283608 dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Abstraction100002137 owl:Thing
rdfs:label
Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.
rdfs:comment
Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22 (1988), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court further refined the test for determining whether federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state law as opposed to federal law under the Erie doctrine. The question in Stewart was whether the federal venue transfer statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), occupied the field or whether Alabama law's unfavorable stance towards forum-selection clauses should instead be applied. The Court held that the federal statute governed the District Court's decision whether to give effect to the forum-selection clause.
foaf:name
Stewart Organization, Inc., et al. v. Ricoh Corp., et al.
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1988_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Ricoh dbc:Diversity_jurisdiction_case_law dbc:Conflict_of_laws_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
35545983
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
954509599
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbc:1988_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Ricoh dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Certiorari dbr:En_banc dbc:Diversity_jurisdiction_case_law dbr:Erie_doctrine dbc:Conflict_of_laws_case_law dbr:F.2d dbr:Hanna_v._Plumer dbr:11th_Cir. dbr:L._Ed._2d
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n12:case.html n16:86-1908 n18:scholar_case%3Fcase=3788072370221202936 n15:usrep487022.pdf n8:22.html n21: n22: n25:
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.0j9n12l yago-res:Stewart_Organization,_Inc._v._Ricoh_Corp. wikidata:Q7615905 n24:4vyMC
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Primary_sources dbt:Reflist dbt:Usc dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Ussc dbt:Caselaw_source
dbp:dissent
Scalia
dbp:joinmajority
Rehnquist, Brennan, White, Blackmun, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy
dbp:oyez
n16:86-1908
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
22
dbp:usvol
487
dbp:arguedate
0001-03-01
dbp:argueyear
1988
dbp:case
Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.,
dbp:courtlistener
n25:
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-20
dbp:decideyear
1988
dbp:findlaw
n8:22.html
dbp:fullname
Stewart Organization, Inc., et al. v. Ricoh Corp., et al.
dbp:holding
Federal law governed the District Court's decision whether to grant motion to transfer case to venue provided in contractual forum-selection clause.
dbp:justia
n12:case.html
dbp:litigants
Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.
dbp:majority
Marshall
dbp:loc
n15:usrep487022.pdf
dbo:abstract
Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22 (1988), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court further refined the test for determining whether federal courts sitting in diversity must apply state law as opposed to federal law under the Erie doctrine. The question in Stewart was whether the federal venue transfer statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), occupied the field or whether Alabama law's unfavorable stance towards forum-selection clauses should instead be applied. The Court held that the federal statute governed the District Court's decision whether to give effect to the forum-selection clause.
dbp:concurrence
Kennedy
dbp:googlescholar
n18:scholar_case%3Fcase=3788072370221202936
dbp:joinconcurrence
O'Connor
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Stewart_Organization,_Inc._v._Ricoh_Corp.?oldid=954509599&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
5129
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Stewart_Organization,_Inc._v._Ricoh_Corp.