This HTML5 document contains 78 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n5https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n19https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
n20https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112132/schweiker-v-chilicky/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n13https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/487/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n15https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/487/412/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/
n22https://www.oyez.org/cases/1987/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Schweiker_v._Chilicky
rdf:type
dbo:Case yago:Happening107283608 yago:Case107308889 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Event100029378 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases dbo:UnitOfWork yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRehnquistCourt wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:LegalCase owl:Thing
rdfs:label
Schweiker v. Chilicky
rdfs:comment
Schweiker v. Chilicky, 487 U.S. 412 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court decision that established limitations on implied causes of action. The Court determined that a cause of action would not be implied for the violation of rights where the U.S. Congress had already provided a remedy for the violation of rights at issue, even if the remedy was inadequate. 1. * some indication that Congress considered providing a cause of action, and chose not to; and 2. * the design of some government program containing what Congress considers an adequate remedial mechanism.
foaf:name
Schweiker, et al. v. Chilicky, et al.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Implied_constitutional_cause_of_action_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1988_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
1754532
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
937953300
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:Implied_constitutional_cause_of_action_case_law dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Bivens_v._Six_Unknown_Named_Agents dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Rehnquist_Court dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:1988_in_United_States_case_law dbr:U.S._Congress dbr:Lists_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_volume dbr:CCH_(company) dbr:U.S._LEXIS dbr:Implied_causes_of_action dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_487 dbr:L._Ed._2d dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n5:scholar_case%3Fcase=14560801973060254477 n13:412.html n15: n20: n22:86-1781
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.05tbxj yago-res:Schweiker_v._Chilicky n19:4um4M wikidata:Q7433226
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Ussc dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case
dbp:dissent
Brennan
dbp:joindissent
Marshall, Blackmun
dbp:joinmajority
Rehnquist, White, Scalia, Kennedy; Stevens
dbp:oyez
n22:86-1781
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
dbp:uspage
412
dbp:usvol
487
dbp:arguedate
0001-03-01
dbp:argueyear
1988
dbp:case
Schweiker v. Chilicky,
dbp:courtlistener
n20:
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-24
dbp:decideyear
1988
dbp:findlaw
n13:412.html
dbp:fullname
Schweiker, et al. v. Chilicky, et al.
dbp:holding
The improper denial of Social Security disability benefits, allegedly resulting from due process violations by petitioners in their administration of the CDR program, cannot give rise to a cause of action for money damages against petitioners.
dbp:justia
n15:
dbp:litigants
Schweiker v. Chilicky
dbp:majority
O'Connor
dbo:abstract
Schweiker v. Chilicky, 487 U.S. 412 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court decision that established limitations on implied causes of action. The Court determined that a cause of action would not be implied for the violation of rights where the U.S. Congress had already provided a remedy for the violation of rights at issue, even if the remedy was inadequate. In this case, seriously disabled people were wrongfully being denied federal benefits (although, on appeal to an Administrative Law Judge, two-thirds had their payments restored). Although Congress provides for the return of back-pay, no provision is made for pain and suffering or other economic losses. The injured parties sued responsible agency personnel, under the theory that pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents they could allege a private right of action for deprivation of due process. The Court examined whether Congress intended a private right of action under these circumstances, and concluded that if Congress has created a meaningful remedy – even if it is incomplete – then no Bivens-type remedy is available. Special factors counseling hesitation included judicial deference to a combination of: 1. * some indication that Congress considered providing a cause of action, and chose not to; and 2. * the design of some government program containing what Congress considers an adequate remedial mechanism. Here Congress has provided a great deal of process, and some relief, and has been otherwise silent as to a remedy, which the Court found to be enough to foreclose a Bivens remedy.
dbp:concurrence
Stevens
dbp:googlescholar
n5:scholar_case%3Fcase=14560801973060254477
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Schweiker_v._Chilicky?oldid=937953300&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
3536
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Schweiker_v._Chilicky