This HTML5 document contains 48 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
n16https://www.kcl.ac.uk/people/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n9https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n17https://www.theventurecapitalstate.com/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Rationalist–constructivist_debate
rdf:type
yago:AuditoryCommunication107109019 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Speech107109196 yago:Argument107140978 dbo:TelevisionShow yago:Discussion107140659 yago:WikicatDebates yago:Communication100033020
rdfs:label
Rationalist–constructivist debate
rdfs:comment
The rationalist–constructivist debate is an ontological debate within international relations theory between rationalism and constructivism. In a 1998 article, Christian Reus-Smit and Richard Price suggested that the rationalist–constructivist debate was, or was about to become, the most significant in the discipline of international relations theory. The debate can be seen as to be centered on preference formation, with rationalist theories (such as neorealism) characterising changes in terms of shifts in capabilities, whereas constructivists focus on preference formation.
dcterms:subject
dbc:Rationalism dbc:Constructivism dbc:Ontology dbc:International_relations_theory dbc:Political_debates
dbo:wikiPageID
30123047
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1095727559
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Neorealism_(international_relations) dbr:International_relations_theory dbr:Rationalism_(international_relations) dbc:Rationalism dbr:Theory_of_International_Politics dbr:Neoliberalism_(international_relations) dbc:International_relations_theory dbr:James_Fearon dbc:Political_debates dbr:Alexander_Wendt dbc:Ontology dbr:Positivism dbr:Christian_Reus-Smit dbr:Norm_(social) dbr:Ontology dbr:Constructivism_(international_relations) dbr:Great_Debates_in_international_relations_theory dbc:Constructivism
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n16:robyn-klingler-vidra n17:
owl:sameAs
n9:4u2wo freebase:m.0g543fy wikidata:Q7295788
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Circular_reference dbt:International_relations_theories
dbo:abstract
The rationalist–constructivist debate is an ontological debate within international relations theory between rationalism and constructivism. In a 1998 article, Christian Reus-Smit and Richard Price suggested that the rationalist–constructivist debate was, or was about to become, the most significant in the discipline of international relations theory. The debate can be seen as to be centered on preference formation, with rationalist theories (such as neorealism) characterising changes in terms of shifts in capabilities, whereas constructivists focus on preference formation.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Debate
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Rationalist–constructivist_debate?oldid=1095727559&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
9071
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Rationalist–constructivist_debate