This HTML5 document contains 38 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n17https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n13http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Pendergast_v_Attorney-General
rdf:type
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:label
Pendergast v Attorney-General
rdfs:comment
Pendergast v Attorney-General (1998) 3 NZ ConvC 192,729 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the availability of rectification if a unilateral mistake exists.
dbp:name
Pendergast v Attorney-General
foaf:depiction
n13:Coat_of_arms_of_New_Zealand.svg
dcterms:subject
dbc:1998_in_New_Zealand_law dbc:1998_in_case_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand_cases dbc:New_Zealand_contract_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
44070914
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1013764333
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:New_Zealand dbc:1998_in_New_Zealand_law dbc:1998_in_case_law dbr:High_Court_of_New_Zealand dbr:Rectification_(law) dbc:New_Zealand_contract_case_law dbr:Lease dbc:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand_cases
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q18387437 freebase:m.012225tv n17:ms2X
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Orphan dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:NewZealand-case-law-stub dbt:One_source
dbo:thumbnail
n13:Coat_of_arms_of_New_Zealand.svg?width=300
dbp:citations
3
dbp:court
dbr:High_Court_of_New_Zealand
dbp:fullName
Pendergast v Attorney-General
dbp:judges
Penlington J
dbo:abstract
Pendergast v Attorney-General (1998) 3 NZ ConvC 192,729 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the availability of rectification if a unilateral mistake exists.
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Pendergast_v_Attorney-General?oldid=1013764333&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
1736
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Pendergast_v_Attorney-General