This HTML5 document contains 89 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n19https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n5https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n7https://www.leagle.com/decision/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n20https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n10https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/565/266/
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Maples_v._Thomas
rdf:type
yago:Event100029378 yago:Case107308889 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Happening107283608 wikidata:Q2334719 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase dbo:Case yago:Abstraction100002137 owl:Thing dbo:LegalCase yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:UnitOfWork yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
rdfs:label
Maples v. Thomas
rdfs:comment
Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. 266 (2012), is a United States Supreme Court ruling in which the Court ruled 7–2 that Cory R. Maples, who had been convicted of murdering two people and faced a possible death sentence, should get another opportunity in court because his lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell had abandoned him. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented from the Court's holding, arguing that the procedural default shouldn't be excused.
foaf:name
Cory S. Maples v. Kim T. Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
dcterms:subject
dbc:Capital_punishment_in_Alabama dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:United_States_death_penalty_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
34478746
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1107630160
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Certiorari dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:F._App'x dbr:Information_(formal_criminal_charge) dbr:So.2d dbr:Death_sentence dbc:Capital_punishment_in_Alabama dbc:2012_in_United_States_case_law dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:F.3d dbr:Indictment dbr:11th_Cir. dbr:Sullivan_&_Cromwell dbr:Preliminary_hearing dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:Concurring_opinion dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:Arraignment dbc:United_States_death_penalty_case_law dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Brewer_v._Williams
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n7:infco20091026059 n10: n19:10-63 n20:10-63.pdf
owl:sameAs
n5:4rEBF freebase:m.0j290ks yago-res:Maples_v._Thomas wikidata:Q6754053
dbp:subsequent
On remand, Maples v. Comm'r of Ala. Dep't of Corr., 460 F. App'x 860 .
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Cleanup_bare_URLs dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Ussc
dbp:dissent
Scalia
dbp:docket
10
dbp:joindissent
Thomas
dbp:joinmajority
Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan
dbp:oyez
n19:10-63
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
25920.0
dbp:uspage
266
dbp:usvol
565
dbp:arguedate
0001-10-04
dbp:argueyear
2011
dbp:case
Maples v. Thomas,
dbp:decidedate
0001-01-18
dbp:decideyear
2012
dbp:fullname
Cory S. Maples v. Kim T. Thomas, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
dbp:holding
Maples has shown the requisite “cause” to excuse his procedural default due to the abandonment of his attorneys during a critical stage of his appeals.
dbp:justia
n10:
dbp:litigants
Maples v. Thomas
dbp:majority
Ginsburg
dbp:otherSource
Supreme Court
dbp:otherUrl
n20:10-63.pdf
dbo:abstract
Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. 266 (2012), is a United States Supreme Court ruling in which the Court ruled 7–2 that Cory R. Maples, who had been convicted of murdering two people and faced a possible death sentence, should get another opportunity in court because his lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell had abandoned him. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented from the Court's holding, arguing that the procedural default shouldn't be excused.
dbp:concurrence
Alito
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Maples_v._Thomas?oldid=1107630160&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
6203
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Maples_v._Thomas