This HTML5 document contains 51 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n9http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Hangarter_v._Provident
rdfs:label
Hangarter v. Provident
rdfs:comment
Hangarter v. Provident Insurance Company, 373 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2004), (UnumProvident, now referred to as Unum or Unum Group), is a landmark decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on the issue of disability bad faith insurance law. Because California’s bad faith insurance law is often referred to in many states as a model nationwide, the 9th Circuit’s decision has a persuasive impact throughout the country.
foaf:depiction
n9:Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts,_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_disability_case_law dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases dbc:2004_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_evidence_case_law dbc:Insurance_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
38328504
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1107988214
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases dbr:Daubert dbr:Unum_Group dbc:United_States_disability_case_law dbr:9th_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals dbr:Daubert_v._Merrell_Dow_Pharmaceuticals dbc:2004_in_United_States_case_law dbc:Insurance_case_law dbr:Breach_of_contract dbr:A._Wallace_Tashima dbr:Punitive_damages dbr:F.3d dbr:Insurance_bad_faith dbc:United_States_evidence_case_law dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:Unum dbr:Richard_R._Clifton dbr:Alfred_T._Goodwin dbr:Good_faith
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q17020251 freebase:m.0swkkfl n16:fjQ8
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Reflist dbt:Infobox_COA_case dbt:Cn
dbo:thumbnail
n9:Seal_of_the_United_States_Courts,_Ninth_Judicial_Circuit.svg?width=300
dbp:citations
25920.0
dbp:court
dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
dbp:courtseal
Seal of the United States Courts, Ninth Judicial Circuit.svg
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-25
dbp:decideyear
2004
dbp:fullname
Hangarter v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co.
dbp:holding
Affirmed lower court's decision
dbp:judges
dbr:Alfred_T._Goodwin dbr:A._Wallace_Tashima dbr:Richard_R._Clifton
dbp:litigants
Hangarter v. Provident
dbo:abstract
Hangarter v. Provident Insurance Company, 373 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2004), (UnumProvident, now referred to as Unum or Unum Group), is a landmark decision by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on the issue of disability bad faith insurance law. Because California’s bad faith insurance law is often referred to in many states as a model nationwide, the 9th Circuit’s decision has a persuasive impact throughout the country.
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Hangarter_v._Provident?oldid=1107988214&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
8228
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Hangarter_v._Provident