This HTML5 document contains 84 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n13https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n14http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/1975/
n18http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Crabb_v_Arun_DC
rdf:type
yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:WikicatEnglishEstoppelCases yago:Event100029378 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Case107308889 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:WikicatEnglishEnforceabilityCases dbo:Agent
rdfs:label
Crabb v Arun DC
rdfs:comment
Crabb v Arun District Council [1975] EWCA Civ 7 is a leading English land law and contract case concerning "proprietary estoppel". Lord Denning MR affirmed that where agreements concern the acquisition of rights over land, there is no need for both parties to provide a consideration for upholding the bargain. While promissory estoppel cannot found a cause of action it was held that in the peculiar situation of land, consideration is not necessary at all.
dbp:name
Crabb v Arun DC
foaf:depiction
n18:Bognor_Regis_seafront,_England.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:English_land_case_law dbc:1975_in_British_law dbc:English_estoppel_case_law dbc:Lord_Denning_cases dbc:20th_century_in_West_Sussex dbc:1975_in_case_law dbc:English_enforceability_case_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases
dbo:wikiPageID
23133550
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1088507260
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:1975_in_British_law dbr:Inwards_v_Baker dbr:Bognor_Regis dbr:Proprietary_estoppel dbr:Bamsden_v_Dyson dbr:Bank_Negara_Indonesia_v_Philip_Foallm dbc:English_land_case_law dbc:English_estoppel_case_law dbr:Lord_Denning_MR dbr:Central_London_Property_Trust_v_High_Trees_House dbr:Siew_Soon_Hah_v_Wang_Tong_Hong dbr:Plimmer_v_City_of_Wellington_Corporation dbr:Plimmer_v_Wellington_Corporation dbr:English_land_law dbr:Moorgate_Mercantile_v_Twitchings dbr:Scarman_LJ dbr:Frederick_Lawton_(judge) dbr:Arun_District_Council dbr:Attorney-General_to_the_Prince_of_Wales_v_Collom dbr:English_contract_law dbc:Lord_Denning_cases dbr:Consideration dbr:Harold_Danckwerts dbr:Pagham dbr:The_Duke_of_Beaufort_v_Patrick dbr:Richards_(Charles)_v_Oppenhaim dbr:Hughes_v_Metropolitan_Railway_Co dbc:20th_century_in_West_Sussex dbc:1975_in_case_law dbr:Birmingham_&_District_Land_Co_v_The_London_&_North_Western_Railway dbc:English_enforceability_case_law dbr:ER_Ives_Investment_Ltd_v_High dbr:Ramsden_v_Dyson dbr:Privy_Council dbr:English_trusts_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_(England_and_Wales)_cases dbr:Easement dbr:Promissory_estoppel
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n14:7.html
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q5180259 n13:4iJdv freebase:m.064qptv
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Use_British_English dbt:Cquote dbt:Frac dbt:Infobox_Court_Case dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Short_description dbt:Clist_estoppel dbt:Reflist
dbo:thumbnail
n18:Bognor_Regis_seafront,_England.jpg?width=300
dbp:citations
[1975] EWCA Civ 7, [1976] 1 Ch 179
dbp:court
Court of Appeal
dbp:keywords
dbr:Proprietary_estoppel dbr:Consideration
dbo:abstract
Crabb v Arun District Council [1975] EWCA Civ 7 is a leading English land law and contract case concerning "proprietary estoppel". Lord Denning MR affirmed that where agreements concern the acquisition of rights over land, there is no need for both parties to provide a consideration for upholding the bargain. While promissory estoppel cannot found a cause of action it was held that in the peculiar situation of land, consideration is not necessary at all.
dbp:opinions
Lord Denning MR
gold:hypernym
dbr:Law
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Crabb_v_Arun_DC?oldid=1088507260&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
17142
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Crabb_v_Arun_DC