This HTML5 document contains 80 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n9https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n14http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Canada_Steamship_Lines_Ltd_v_R
rdf:type
yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:Event100029378 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Case107308889
rdfs:label
Canada Steamship Lines Ltd v R
rdfs:comment
Canada Steamship Lines Ltd v R [1952] UKPC 1 is a Canadian contract law case, also relevant for English contract law, concerning the interpretation of unfair terms contra proferentem. The case was decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada, as the cause for appeal arose before the abolition of such appeals in 1949. Although arising in civil law under the Civil Code of Lower Canada, it has been influential in similar cases under English law.
dbp:name
Canada Steamship Lines Ltd v R
foaf:depiction
n14:Montreal_Panorama_II.jpg
dcterms:subject
dbc:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases_on_appeal_from_Canada dbc:English_contract_case_law dbc:Canadian_contract_case_law dbc:1952_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:Ships_of_CP_Ships dbc:Canada_Steamship_Lines
dbo:wikiPageID
30725652
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1083094330
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Canada dbc:Canada_Steamship_Lines dbr:Canada_Steamship_Lines_Ltd dbr:Port_of_Montreal dbr:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council dbr:Lord_Morton_of_Henryton dbr:Lord_Normand dbr:Lionel_Cohen,_Baron_Cohen dbc:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases_on_appeal_from_Canada dbr:English_contract_law dbr:Strict_liability dbr:Fire dbr:Canadian_contract_law dbr:Lachine_Canal dbr:Charles_Holland_Locke dbr:Samuel_Porter,_Baron_Porter dbr:Oxy-acetylene dbr:Cyril_Asquith,_Baron_Asquith_of_Bishopstone dbr:Unfair_Contract_Terms_Act_1977 dbc:1952_in_Canadian_case_law dbc:English_contract_case_law dbr:Common_law dbr:Old_Port_of_Montreal dbr:Hollier_v_Rambler_Motors_(AMC)_Ltd dbr:Civil_Code_of_Lower_Canada dbc:Ships_of_CP_Ships dbr:Exchequer_Court_of_Canada dbr:Unfair_Contract_Terms_Bill dbr:Gross_negligence dbc:Canadian_contract_case_law dbr:Contra_proferentum dbr:Interpreting_contracts_in_English_law dbr:Contra_proferentem
owl:sameAs
n9:4fESx wikidata:Q5029434 freebase:m.0gfjjjz
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Clist_construction dbt:Clist_fair_terms dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_BAILII dbt:Cite_CanLII
dbo:thumbnail
n14:Montreal_Panorama_II.jpg?width=300
dbp:caption
dbr:Old_Port_of_Montreal
dbp:court
dbr:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council
dbp:judges
dbr:Lionel_Cohen,_Baron_Cohen dbr:Lord_Morton_of_Henryton dbr:Lord_Normand dbr:Cyril_Asquith,_Baron_Asquith_of_Bishopstone dbr:Samuel_Porter,_Baron_Porter
dbp:keywords
Unfair terms, contra proferentum
dbo:abstract
Canada Steamship Lines Ltd v R [1952] UKPC 1 is a Canadian contract law case, also relevant for English contract law, concerning the interpretation of unfair terms contra proferentem. The case was decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada, as the cause for appeal arose before the abolition of such appeals in 1949. Although arising in civil law under the Civil Code of Lower Canada, it has been influential in similar cases under English law.
dbp:appealedFrom
, reversing judgments of Angers J in the Exchequer Court of Canada, [1948] ExCR 635
dbp:dateDecided
1952-01-21
dbp:decisionBy
dbr:Lord_Morton_of_Henryton
dbp:numberOfJudges
6
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Canada_Steamship_Lines_Ltd_v_R?oldid=1083094330&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
6347
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Canada_Steamship_Lines_Ltd_v_R