This HTML5 document contains 177 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
n16https://29qish1lqx5q2k5d7b491joo-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
yago-reshttp://yago-knowledge.org/resource/
n20https://scholar.google.com/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n22https://www.oyez.org/cases/1970/
n7https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/108375/bivens-v-six-unknown-fed-narcotics-agents/
n18https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
umbel-rchttp://umbel.org/umbel/rc/
n11http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
n12http://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/torts/torts-keyed-to-prosser/torts-in-the-age-of-statutes/bivens-v-six-unknown-named-agents-of-federal-bureau-of-narcotics-2/
n24http://openjurist.org/409/f2d/718/
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n21http://supreme.justia.com/us/403/388/
n19http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep403/usrep403388/
n15https://openjurist.org/403/us/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
n23http://openjurist.org/456/f2d/1339/
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Bivens_v._Six_Unknown_Named_Agents
rdf:type
wikidata:Q2334719 yago:Event100029378 dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases dbo:UnitOfWork yago:Happening107283608 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:LegalCase yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 dbo:Case owl:Thing yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:label
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
rdfs:comment
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), was a case in which the US Supreme Court ruled that an implied cause of action existed for an individual whose Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizures had been violated by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. The victim of such a deprivation could sue for the violation of the Fourth Amendment itself despite the lack of any federal statute authorizing such a suit. The existence of a remedy for the violation was implied by the importance of the right violated.
foaf:name
Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
dcterms:subject
dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbc:Implied_constitutional_cause_of_action_case_law dbc:1970s_in_Brooklyn dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:Drug_Enforcement_Administration_litigation dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbc:1971_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
1754621
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1095945181
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbr:United_States_magistrate_judge dbr:Hugo_Black dbr:Carlson_v._Green dbr:Private_prison dbr:Federal_Bureau_of_Narcotics dbr:Maxims_of_equity dbr:Plaintiff dbr:Lawyers'_Edition dbr:Yeshiva_University dbr:Mitchell_v._Forsyth dbr:Police_brutality dbr:Hernandez_v._Mesa dbr:Brownback_v._King dbr:Correctional_Services_Corporation_v._Malesko dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_403 dbr:Warrant_(law) dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:McCarthy_v._Madigan dbr:Bush_v._Lucas dbr:Constitutional_right dbr:Eighth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Lawsuit dbr:Federal_Supplement dbr:Certiorari dbr:Brooklyn dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Schweiker_v._Chilicky dbr:Pro_bono dbr:Implied_cause_of_action dbr:Wilkie_v._Robbins dbr:Wood_v._Moss dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit dbr:Federal_Reporter dbr:John_Marshall_Harlan_II dbr:Minneci_v._Pollard dbr:Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Private_right_of_action dbr:Hui_v._Castaneda dbr:California_Law_Review dbr:Qualified_immunity dbr:LexisNexis dbr:Subject-matter_jurisdiction dbr:Reichle_v._Howards dbr:Alexander_A._Reinert dbr:Concurring_opinion dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbc:Implied_constitutional_cause_of_action_case_law dbr:Ashcroft_v._Iqbal dbr:Ashcroft_v._al-Kidd dbc:1970s_in_Brooklyn dbr:FDIC_v._Meyer dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_U.S._Constitution dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_New_York dbr:Stafford_v._Briggs dbr:Benjamin_N._Cardozo_School_of_Law dbr:Professor dbr:US_Supreme_Court dbr:Hartman_v._Moore dbr:Egbert_v._Boule dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Saucier_v._Katz dbr:Civil_Rights_Act_of_1871 dbr:Farmer_v._Brennan dbr:Monetary_damages dbr:Harry_Blackmun dbr:Davis_v._Passman dbr:William_J._Brennan,_Jr. dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Burger_Court dbr:Anderson_v._Creighton dbc:Drug_Enforcement_Administration_litigation dbr:Fifth_Circuit dbr:United_States_v._Stanley dbr:Ziglar_v._Abbasi dbr:Chappell_v._Wallace dbr:Chief_Justice_Burger dbc:1971_in_United_States_case_law
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
n12: n15:388 n16:07-Frampton.pdf n19:usrep403388.pdf n20:scholar_case%3Fcase=4836406244398815814 n21:case.html n22:301 n23:bivens-v-six-unknown-named-agents-of-federal-bureau-of-narcotics n24:bivens-v-six-unknown-named-agents-of-federal-bureau-of-narcotics n7: n11:getcase.pl%3Fnavby=CASE&court=US&vol=403&page=388
owl:sameAs
n18:4ZL8R wikidata:Q4919234 freebase:m.05tc53 yago-res:Bivens_v._Six_Unknown_Named_Agents
dbp:subsequent
17280.0
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Sfn dbt:Wikisource dbt:Ussc dbt:Note dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Blockquote dbt:Reflist dbt:Refend dbt:Refbegin dbt:Ref dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Ibid dbt:US4thAmendment
dbp:dissent
Black Burger Blackmun
dbp:docket
21 19 17 15
dbp:joinmajority
Douglas, Stewart, White, Marshall
dbp:lawsapplied
dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:oyez
n22:301
dbp:parallelcitations
172800.0
dbp:prior
17280.0
dbp:uspage
388
dbp:usvol
403
dbp:arguedate
0001-01-12
dbp:argueyear
1971
dbp:case
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents,
dbp:courtlistener
n7:
dbp:date
2017 2020 2021 2022
dbp:decidedate
0001-06-21
dbp:decideyear
1971
dbp:findlaw
n11:getcase.pl%3Fnavby=CASE&court=US&vol=403&page=388
dbp:fullname
Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
dbp:holding
Individuals have an implied cause of action against federal government officials who have violated their constitutional rights. Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded.
dbp:justia
n21:case.html
dbp:litigants
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
dbp:majority
Brennan
dbp:volume
589 582 592 596
dbp:loc
n19:usrep403388.pdf
dbo:abstract
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), was a case in which the US Supreme Court ruled that an implied cause of action existed for an individual whose Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizures had been violated by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. The victim of such a deprivation could sue for the violation of the Fourth Amendment itself despite the lack of any federal statute authorizing such a suit. The existence of a remedy for the violation was implied by the importance of the right violated. The case has been subsequently interpreted to create a cause of action against the federal government similar to the one in 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 against the states.
dbp:concurrence
Harlan
dbp:googlescholar
n20:scholar_case%3Fcase=4836406244398815814
dbp:openjurist
n15:388
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Bivens_v._Six_Unknown_Named_Agents?oldid=1095945181&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
14114
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Bivens_v._Six_Unknown_Named_Agents