This HTML5 document contains 72 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dctermshttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n15https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
yagohttp://dbpedia.org/class/yago/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n12http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Australian_Securities_and_Investments_Commission_v_Rich
rdf:type
yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Happening107283608 yago:Event100029378 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:Case107308889 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
rdfs:label
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich
rdfs:comment
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich, was one of the biggest civil cases in NSW Supreme Court history, in which the Australian Securities and Investments Commission accused former executive directors of One.Tel telecommunications company, Jodee Rich and Mark Silbermann, of having failed to meet their duty of care in the months leading up to the company's collapse in May 2001. The legal process ran for almost nine years, took up 232 sitting days and generated 16,642 pages of transcripts. In November 2009, the NSW Supreme Court Justice Robert Austin comprehensively dismissed ASIC's case against the Rich and Silbermann, saying the corporate regulator had failed to prove any aspect of its pleaded case against either defendant.
dbp:name
ASIC v Rich
foaf:depiction
n12:New_South_Wales_coa.png
dcterms:subject
dbc:Australian_Securities_and_Investments_Commission dbc:Corporate_governance_in_Australia dbc:Australian_corporate_law dbc:2009_in_Australian_law dbc:Supreme_Court_of_New_South_Wales_cases dbc:2009_in_case_law
dbo:wikiPageID
17675493
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
1027332254
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbc:Corporate_governance_in_Australia dbr:NSW_Supreme_Court dbr:PricewaterhouseCoopers dbr:Telstra dbr:CGU_Insurance dbr:Kerry_Packer dbc:Supreme_Court_of_New_South_Wales_cases dbr:Australian_company_law dbc:2009_in_Australian_law dbc:Australian_Securities_and_Investments_Commission dbr:Robert_Austin_(judge) dbr:Supreme_Court_of_New_South_Wales dbr:US_corporate_law dbr:Peter_Yates dbr:Optus dbr:Directors'_duties dbr:Australian_Securities_and_Investments_Commission dbr:Ernst_and_Young dbr:Lachlan_Murdoch dbr:Business_judgment_rule dbr:ASIC dbr:Publishing_and_Broadcasting_Limited dbr:Rupert_Murdoch dbr:Brian_Long dbr:Jodee_Rich dbr:News_Corporation_(1980–2013) dbr:GSM dbr:Australian_Corporations_and_Securities_Reports dbc:Australian_corporate_law dbc:2009_in_case_law dbr:UK_company_law dbr:James_Packer dbr:One.Tel dbr:Federal_Law_Reports
owl:sameAs
freebase:m.047fd4k n15:4Jtc5 wikidata:Q4654239
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Use_Australian_English dbt:Cite_AustLII dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Law dbt:Citation_needed dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Reflist
dbo:thumbnail
n12:New_South_Wales_coa.png?width=300
dbp:court
dbr:Supreme_Court_of_New_South_Wales
dbp:judges
dbr:Robert_Austin_(judge)
dbp:keywords
dbr:Directors'_duties
dbo:abstract
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich, was one of the biggest civil cases in NSW Supreme Court history, in which the Australian Securities and Investments Commission accused former executive directors of One.Tel telecommunications company, Jodee Rich and Mark Silbermann, of having failed to meet their duty of care in the months leading up to the company's collapse in May 2001. The legal process ran for almost nine years, took up 232 sitting days and generated 16,642 pages of transcripts. In November 2009, the NSW Supreme Court Justice Robert Austin comprehensively dismissed ASIC's case against the Rich and Silbermann, saying the corporate regulator had failed to prove any aspect of its pleaded case against either defendant.
dbp:dateDecided
2009-11-18
gold:hypernym
dbr:Cases
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Australian_Securities_and_Investments_Commission_v_Rich?oldid=1027332254&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
17318
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Australian_Securities_and_Investments_Commission_v_Rich