This HTML5 document contains 44 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dcthttp://purl.org/dc/terms/
dbohttp://dbpedia.org/ontology/
foafhttp://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
n16https://global.dbpedia.org/id/
dbthttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
freebasehttp://rdf.freebase.com/ns/
n7http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
owlhttp://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
wikipedia-enhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
dbphttp://dbpedia.org/property/
dbchttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:
provhttp://www.w3.org/ns/prov#
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
wikidatahttp://www.wikidata.org/entity/
goldhttp://purl.org/linguistics/gold/
dbrhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/

Statements

Subject Item
dbr:Gore_District_Council_v_Power_Co_Ltd
rdf:type
dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:label
Gore District Council v Power Co Ltd
rdfs:comment
Gore District Council v Power Co Ltd [1997] 1 NZLR 537 is a cited case in New Zealand that confirms that a contract can be for an indefinite term, as well as confirming that a contract does not become frustrated simply due to it being a bad bargain.
owl:sameAs
wikidata:Q18167435 freebase:m.01113gyw n16:kjfk
dbp:fullName
Gore District Council v Power Co Ltd
dbp:name
Gore District Council v Power Co Ltd
foaf:depiction
n7:Coat_of_arms_of_New_Zealand.svg
dct:subject
dbc:Gore_District,_New_Zealand dbc:1996_in_case_law dbc:1996_in_New_Zealand_law dbc:New_Zealand_contract_case_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand_cases
dbo:wikiPageID
43121231
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
976758982
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbr:Kenneth_Keith dbr:Gore,_New_Zealand dbc:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand_cases dbr:Peter_Blanchard dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand dbc:1996_in_case_law dbr:Ivor_Richardson dbc:Gore_District,_New_Zealand dbc:1996_in_New_Zealand_law dbc:New_Zealand_contract_case_law dbr:Ian_McKay
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:NewZealand-case-law-stub dbt:Orphan dbt:Reflist
gold:hypernym
dbr:Case
dbp:citations
[1997] 1 NZLR 537
dbp:court
dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand
dbp:judges
Richardson P, McKay J, Henry, Keith, Blanchard J
dbp:keywords
Illegal contracts, validation
dbp:dateDecided
1996-11-04
dbo:thumbnail
n7:Coat_of_Arms_of_New_Zealand.svg?width=300
prov:wasDerivedFrom
wikipedia-en:Gore_District_Council_v_Power_Co_Ltd?oldid=976758982&ns=0
dbo:wikiPageLength
3312
dbo:abstract
Gore District Council v Power Co Ltd [1997] 1 NZLR 537 is a cited case in New Zealand that confirms that a contract can be for an indefinite term, as well as confirming that a contract does not become frustrated simply due to it being a bad bargain.
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
wikipedia-en:Gore_District_Council_v_Power_Co_Ltd
Subject Item
wikipedia-en:Gore_District_Council_v_Power_Co_Ltd
foaf:primaryTopic
dbr:Gore_District_Council_v_Power_Co_Ltd