About: R v Ladouceur

An Entity of Type: Supreme Court of the United States case, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

R v Ladouceur, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1257 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of random police traffic checks. The Court found that the random checks violated the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned under section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. However, the violation was saved under section 1 as it was a valid form of deterrence for a pressing problem of traffic safety.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • R v Ladouceur, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1257 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of random police traffic checks. The Court found that the random checks violated the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned under section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. However, the violation was saved under section 1 as it was a valid form of deterrence for a pressing problem of traffic safety. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 5724011 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 3101 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1046044235 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • R v Ladouceur (en)
dbp:citations
  • [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1257 (en)
dbp:concurrence
  • Sopinka J. (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 1990-05-31 (xsd:date)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Gerald Jay Ladouceur v Her Majesty The Queen (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 1989-11-06 (xsd:date)
dbp:joinconcurrence
  • Dickson C.J. and Wilson and La Forest JJ. (en)
dbp:joinmajority
  • Lamer, L'Heureux-DubĂ©, Gonthier and McLachlin JJ. (en)
dbp:majority
  • Cory J. (en)
dbp:scc
  • 1989 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • R v Ladouceur, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1257 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of random police traffic checks. The Court found that the random checks violated the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned under section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. However, the violation was saved under section 1 as it was a valid form of deterrence for a pressing problem of traffic safety. (en)
rdfs:label
  • R v Ladouceur (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License