| dbo:description
|
- 2019 United States Supreme Court case (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-12-06 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:case
|
- Gamble v. United States, No. 17-646, 587 U.S. 678 (en)
|
| dbp:concurrence
| |
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
|
- Ginsburg (en)
- Gorsuch (en)
|
| dbp:docket
| |
| dbp:fullname
|
- Terance Martez Gamble, Petitioner v. United States (en)
|
| dbp:googlescholar
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- The court declined to overturn the separate sovereigns doctrine, concluding that historical precedent has held that it is a part of the Fifth Amendment. (en)
|
| dbp:joinmajority
|
- Roberts, Thomas, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh (en)
|
| dbp:justia
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
|
- Gamble v. United States (en)
|
| dbp:majority
| |
| dbp:oralargument
| |
| dbp:otherSource
| |
| dbp:otherUrl
| |
| dbp:oyez
| |
| dbp:parallelcitations
| |
| dbp:prior
|
- United States v. Gamble, 694 F. App'x 750 ; cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 2707 . (en)
|
| dbp:questionspresented
|
- Whether the Court should overrule the "separate sovereigns" exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause. (en)
|
| dbp:uspage
| |
| dbp:usvol
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:label
|
- Gamble v. United States (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| foaf:name
|
- Terance Martez Gamble, Petitioner v. United States (en)
|
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
