| dbo:abstract
|
- The Spiliada or Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd, is a leading decision of the House of Lords on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. It has been described as the "seminal case" on jurisdictional issues. (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 8915 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:citations
|
- 84 (xsd:integer)
- 130 (xsd:integer)
- 136 (xsd:integer)
- (en)
- [1986] 3 All ER 843 (en)
- [1986] 3 WLR 972 (en)
- [1987] 1 FTLR 103 (en)
- [1987] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1 (en)
- [1987] AC 460 (en)
- [1987] ECC 168 (en)
|
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:judges
| |
| dbp:name
|
- Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd (en)
|
| dbp:numberOfJudges
| |
| dbp:priorActions
|
- [1985] 2 Lloyd's Rep 116; 82 LSG 1416 (en)
|
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- The Spiliada or Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd, is a leading decision of the House of Lords on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. It has been described as the "seminal case" on jurisdictional issues. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
