An Entity of Type: place, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

R v Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision on the disclosure of evidence in a trial and is considered by most to be one of the most significant criminal law cases of the decade. The Court found that the Crown had a duty to provide the defence with all evidence that could possibly be relevant to the case, regardless of whether the Crown plans to call that evidence at trial or not, or whether it helps or hurts the Crown's case. This case put to rest the long-standing issue of whether the Crown could purposely deny the defence evidence that the Crown found would be harmful to their case.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • R v Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision on the disclosure of evidence in a trial and is considered by most to be one of the most significant criminal law cases of the decade. The Court found that the Crown had a duty to provide the defence with all evidence that could possibly be relevant to the case, regardless of whether the Crown plans to call that evidence at trial or not, or whether it helps or hurts the Crown's case. This case put to rest the long-standing issue of whether the Crown could purposely deny the defence evidence that the Crown found would be harmful to their case. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 3413393 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2903 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1057118425 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • R v Stinchcombe (en)
dbp:citations
  • [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326 (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 1991-11-07 (xsd:date)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • William B Stinchcombe v Her Majesty The Queen (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 1991-05-02 (xsd:date)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal allowed, new trial ordered (en)
dbp:scc
  • 1991 (xsd:integer)
dbp:unanimous
  • Sopinka J. (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • R v Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision on the disclosure of evidence in a trial and is considered by most to be one of the most significant criminal law cases of the decade. The Court found that the Crown had a duty to provide the defence with all evidence that could possibly be relevant to the case, regardless of whether the Crown plans to call that evidence at trial or not, or whether it helps or hurts the Crown's case. This case put to rest the long-standing issue of whether the Crown could purposely deny the defence evidence that the Crown found would be harmful to their case. (en)
rdfs:label
  • R v Stinchcombe (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License