R v Shivpuri [1986] UKHL 2 is a House of Lords case in English law as to whether a criminal attempt which had a "more than merely preparatory act" and mens rea of an inchoate stage but of a crime which transpired to be impossible (or rendered lawful) in its completion – as the actus reus unwittingly related to a lawful, not what the defendant apprehended to be an unlawful substance – amounted to an attempt to commit a crime. The judicial panel, the highest court of England, decided it would amount to the crimes of attempted dealing in and harbouring a controlled drug, with intent to evade the prohibition of importation of the same. In doing so, it overturned its own ruling the year before in Anderton v Ryan, applying the Practice Statement of 1966.
Property | Value |
---|---|
dbo:abstract |
|
dbo:wikiPageID |
|
dbo:wikiPageLength |
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
|
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
|
dbp:casesCited |
|
dbp:citations |
|
dbp:court |
|
dbp:dateDecided |
|
dbp:judges |
|
dbp:keywords |
|
dbp:legislationCited | |
dbp:name |
|
dbp:priorActions |
|
dbp:subsequentActions |
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
dct:subject | |
gold:hypernym | |
rdf:type | |
rdfs:comment |
|
rdfs:label |
|
owl:sameAs | |
prov:wasDerivedFrom | |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | |
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |