About: R v Jogee

An Entity of Type: Thing, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that reversed previous case law on joint enterprise. The Supreme Court delivered its ruling jointly with the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which was considering an appeal from Jamaica, Ruddock v The Queen [2016] UKPC 7.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that reversed previous case law on joint enterprise. The Supreme Court delivered its ruling jointly with the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which was considering an appeal from Jamaica, Ruddock v The Queen [2016] UKPC 7. (en)
dbo:thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Spinney_Hill_Park,_Le...geograph.org.uk_-_94064.jpg?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2013/1433.html https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2015-0015-judgment.pdf
dbo:wikiPageID	49520986 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	20098 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1117664905 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Rowlatts_Hill dbr:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council dbr:Nottingham_Crown_Court dbr:Mens_rea dbr:Theft dbc:2010s_in_Leicester dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases dbr:2016_Judgments_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbc:2016_in_British_law dbc:2016_in_case_law dbr:Jamaica dbc:English_criminal_case_law dbc:History_of_Leicester dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:TWOC dbr:Criminal_law_of_England dbr:Joint_enterprise dbr:Chan_Wing-Siu_v_The_Queen dbr:File:Spinney_Hill_Park,_Leicester_-_geograph.org.uk_-_94064.jpg
dbp:areaOfLaw	dbr:Joint_enterprise
dbp:arguedate	0001-10-29 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2015 (xsd:integer)
dbp:court	dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
dbp:decidedate	0001-02-18 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2016 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname	R v Jogee ; Ruddock v The Queen (en)
dbp:holding	The rule regarding joint enterprise has been wrongly interpreted since the case of Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] AC 168. The correct position is that the defendant must intentionally act or encourage the principal to act with the requisite intent in order to be found liable for the same offence. (en)
dbp:majority	Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Hughes, Lord Toulson and Lord Thomas (en)
dbp:neutralCitation	https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2015-0015-judgment.pdf
dbp:prior	http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2013/1433.html
dbp:reversed	Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] AC 168 (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Bquote dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Cite_bailii dbt:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbt:Infobox_UKSC_case
dcterms:subject	dbc:2010s_in_Leicester dbc:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom_cases dbc:2016_in_British_law dbc:2016_in_case_law dbc:English_criminal_case_law dbc:History_of_Leicester
gold:hypernym	dbr:Judgment
rdfs:comment	R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that reversed previous case law on joint enterprise. The Supreme Court delivered its ruling jointly with the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which was considering an appeal from Jamaica, Ruddock v The Queen [2016] UKPC 7. (en)
rdfs:label	R v Jogee (en)
owl:sameAs	wikidata:R v Jogee https://global.dbpedia.org/id/2AwhU
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:R_v_Jogee?oldid=1117664905&ns=0
foaf:depiction	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Spinney_Hill_Park,_Leicester_-_geograph.org.uk_-_94064.jpg
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:R_v_Jogee
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Ruddock_v_The_Queen
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Roger_Toulson,_Lord_Toulson dbr:English_criminal_law dbr:List_of_United_Kingdom_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:Julian_Knowles_(judge) dbr:Edward_Brown_(barrister) dbr:Common_purpose dbr:Just_for_Kids_Law dbr:2016_Judgments_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom dbr:Case_law dbr:Ruddock_v_The_Queen
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:R_v_Jogee