dbo:abstract
|
- R v Burlingham, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 206 is a leading decision on the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to counsel under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the exclusion of evidence under section 24(2). (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 3790 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:caseName
| |
dbp:citations
| |
dbp:concurrence
|
- Sopinka J. (en)
- Gonthier J. (en)
|
dbp:concurrence/dissent
| |
dbp:decidedDate
| |
dbp:docket
| |
dbp:fullCaseName
|
- Terrence Wayne Burlingham v. Her Majesty The Queen (en)
|
dbp:heardDate
| |
dbp:history
|
- Judgment for the Crown in the British Columbia Court of Appeal. (en)
|
dbp:joinconcurrence
|
- Cory, Iacobucci and Major JJ. (en)
|
dbp:joinmajority
|
- La Forest, Sopinka, Cory and Major JJ. (en)
|
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:notparticipating
|
- Lamer C.J. and McLachlin J. (en)
|
dbp:ratio
|
- Section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms requires:
#The police hold off questioning a detainee until they have exercised their rights to counsel.
#The police to not belittle a detainee's lawyer.
#The police given a detainee an opportunity to speak to a lawyer when offering a plea deal. (en)
|
dbp:ruling
| |
dbp:scc
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
gold:hypernym
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- R v Burlingham, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 206 is a leading decision on the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to counsel under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the exclusion of evidence under section 24(2). (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |