dbo:abstract
|
- Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court reversed the convictions of nine young black men for allegedly raping two white women on a freight train near Scottsboro, Alabama. The majority of the Court reasoned that the right to retain and be represented by a lawyer was fundamental to a fair trial and that at least in some circumstances, the trial judge must inform a defendant of this right. In addition, if the defendant cannot afford a lawyer, the court must appoint one sufficiently far in advance of trial to permit the lawyer to prepare adequately for the trial. Powell was the first time the Court had reversed a state criminal conviction for a violation of a criminal procedural provision of the United States Bill of Rights. In effect, it held that the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause included at least part of the right to counsel referred to in the Sixth Amendment, making that much of the Bill of Rights binding on the states. Before Powell, the Court had reversed state criminal convictions only for racial discrimination in jury selection — a practice that violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 8751 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-10-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:argueyear
| |
dbp:case
| |
dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-11-07 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:decideyear
| |
dbp:dissent
| |
dbp:findlaw
| |
dbp:fullname
|
- Ozie Powell, Willie Roberson, Andy Wright, and Olen Montgomery v. State of Alabama (en)
|
dbp:googlescholar
| |
dbp:holding
|
- Under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment, a state must inform illiterate defendants charged with a capital crime that they have a right to be represented by counsel and must appoint counsel for defendants who cannot afford to hire a lawyer and give counsel adequate time to prepare for trial. (en)
|
dbp:joindissent
| |
dbp:joinmajority
|
- Hughes, Van Devanter, Brandeis, Stone, Roberts, Cardozo (en)
|
dbp:justia
| |
dbp:lawsapplied
| |
dbp:litigants
| |
dbp:loc
| |
dbp:majority
| |
dbp:oyez
| |
dbp:parallelcitations
| |
dbp:prior
|
- 0001-04-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:subsequent
|
- Supreme Court of Alabama reversed (en)
|
dbp:uspage
| |
dbp:usvol
| |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdf:type
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court reversed the convictions of nine young black men for allegedly raping two white women on a freight train near Scottsboro, Alabama. The majority of the Court reasoned that the right to retain and be represented by a lawyer was fundamental to a fair trial and that at least in some circumstances, the trial judge must inform a defendant of this right. In addition, if the defendant cannot afford a lawyer, the court must appoint one sufficiently far in advance of trial to permit the lawyer to prepare adequately for the trial. (en)
|
rdfs:label
| |
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
foaf:name
|
- (en)
- Ozie Powell, Willie Roberson, Andy Wright, and Olen Montgomery v. State of Alabama (en)
|
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |