| dbo:abstract
|
- Peruzzi v. Italy (2015), ECHR Case No. 39294/09 was a decision made by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that specifically addressed anti-judicial speech. The case involved Piero Antonio Peruzzi, an Italian lawyer, who was initially sentenced to four years in prison by the Lucca District Court for defaming a judge. Peruzzi appealed this decision to the Appellate Court of Genoa and was instead fined and required to pay an additional sum to the judge subject to his criticism. On May 25, 2009, Peruzzi brought the case to the European Court of Human Rights, claiming that his conviction was a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (freedom of expression). On June 30, 2015, the European Court of Human Rights made the decision that the conviction of Peruzzi by the Genoa Court was not disproportionate and that his Article 10 rights to freedom of expression were not violated. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 12851 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:arguedate
|
- 0001-05-25 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:argueyear
| |
| dbp:caption
|
- 220 (xsd:integer)
- Signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights (en)
|
| dbp:casenumber
| |
| dbp:chiefjudgename
| |
| dbp:chiefjudgetitle
| |
| dbp:courtName
|
- European Court of Human Rights (en)
|
| dbp:decidedate
|
- 0001-06-30 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
| dbp:decideyear
| |
| dbp:dissent
| |
| dbp:fullname
| |
| dbp:holding
|
- Interference with a one's right to freedom of expression is sometimes "necessary in a democratic society" in order to maintain impartiality in the judiciary (en)
|
| dbp:imagesize
| |
| dbp:lawsapplied
| |
| dbp:litigants
| |
| dbp:majority
|
- Raimondi, Nicolaou, Bianku, Mahoney (en)
|
| dbp:termstart
| |
| dbp:website
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dct:subject
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Peruzzi v. Italy (2015), ECHR Case No. 39294/09 was a decision made by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that specifically addressed anti-judicial speech. The case involved Piero Antonio Peruzzi, an Italian lawyer, who was initially sentenced to four years in prison by the Lucca District Court for defaming a judge. Peruzzi appealed this decision to the Appellate Court of Genoa and was instead fined and required to pay an additional sum to the judge subject to his criticism. On May 25, 2009, Peruzzi brought the case to the European Court of Human Rights, claiming that his conviction was a violation of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (freedom of expression). On June 30, 2015, the European Court of Human Rights made the decision that the conviction of Peruzzi by (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:homepage
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
.svg?width=300)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
