| dbo:abstract
|
- Hill v Tupper (1863) is an English land law case which did not find an easement in a commercial agreement, in this case, related to boat hire. Here, the agreed "exclusive" right was held not to be benefitting the land itself, but just for the business. It could not therefore be enforced directly against third parties competing. (en)
|
| dbo:thumbnail
| |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 2955 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:caption
|
- Remains of a large old tour boat on the Basingstoke Canal (en)
|
| dbp:citations
|
- 2 (xsd:integer)
- 159 (xsd:integer)
|
| dbp:concurring
|
- Martin B (en)
- Bramwell B (en)
|
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:decisionBy
| |
| dbp:judges
|
- Martin B (en)
- Bramwell B (en)
- Pollock CB (en)
|
| dbp:keywords
|
- Easements; right for boating business agreed to be exclusive; whether an exclusive right of navigation enforceable against third parties ; competition law; exclusivity agreements (en)
|
| dbp:name
| |
| dbp:priorActions
|
- Trial, before Bramwell, B and jury who awarded one farthing damages (en)
|
| dbp:transcripts
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| gold:hypernym
| |
| rdf:type
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Hill v Tupper (1863) is an English land law case which did not find an easement in a commercial agreement, in this case, related to boat hire. Here, the agreed "exclusive" right was held not to be benefitting the land itself, but just for the business. It could not therefore be enforced directly against third parties competing. (en)
|
| rdfs:label
| |
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:depiction
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
