dbo:abstract
|
- Hague v Nam Tai Electronics refers to a pair of legal decisions of the Privy Council on appeal from the British Virgin Islands. The first was a unanimous decision given by Lord Hoffman, reported at [2006] UKPC 52, which focussed upon the anti-deprivation rule and secured creditor's rights. The second was a unanimous decision given by Lord Scott, reported at [2008] UKPC 13, and concerned the liability of a company liquidator. The second decision was much more widely reported. Lord Bingham of Cornhill and Lord Rodger of Earlsferry sat on both appeals, but neither gave a judgment in either of them. Separately in the saga, there was also a third application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council on another point, but leave was refused. (en)
|
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
dbo:wikiPageID
| |
dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 14181 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
dbp:appealedFrom
|
- 0001-01-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
|
dbp:citations
| |
dbp:court
| |
dbp:dateDecided
| |
dbp:decisionBy
| |
dbp:fullName
|
- David Hague & Anor v Nam Tai Electronics Inc (en)
|
dbp:judges
| |
dbp:name
|
- David Hague v Nam Tai Electronics Inc (en)
|
dbp:numberOfJudges
| |
dbp:priorActions
|
- David Hague v Nam Tai Electronics Inc & Others (en)
|
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
dcterms:subject
| |
rdfs:comment
|
- Hague v Nam Tai Electronics refers to a pair of legal decisions of the Privy Council on appeal from the British Virgin Islands. The first was a unanimous decision given by Lord Hoffman, reported at [2006] UKPC 52, which focussed upon the anti-deprivation rule and secured creditor's rights. The second was a unanimous decision given by Lord Scott, reported at [2008] UKPC 13, and concerned the liability of a company liquidator. The second decision was much more widely reported. (en)
|
rdfs:label
|
- Hague v Nam Tai Electronics (en)
|
owl:sameAs
| |
prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |