Devlin v. Smith, 89 N.Y. 470 (1882) was a seminal case decided by the New York Court of Appeals in the area of product liability law. The Court held that a duty to third parties "exists when a defect is such as to render the article in itself imminently dangerous, and serious injury to any person using it is a natural and probable consequence of its use." The Court further held that scaffolding to be used in the painting of a courthouse was an inherently dangerous article.

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Devlin v. Smith, 89 N.Y. 470 (1882) was a seminal case decided by the New York Court of Appeals in the area of product liability law. The Court held that a duty to third parties "exists when a defect is such as to render the article in itself imminently dangerous, and serious injury to any person using it is a natural and probable consequence of its use." The Court further held that scaffolding to be used in the painting of a courthouse was an inherently dangerous article. (en)
dbo:thumbnail
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 23546762 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 7676 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 918239436 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:citations
  • 89 (xsd:integer)
dbp:court
dbp:italicTitle
  • yes (en)
dbp:keywords
dbp:name
  • Devlin v. Smith (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dct:subject
rdfs:comment
  • Devlin v. Smith, 89 N.Y. 470 (1882) was a seminal case decided by the New York Court of Appeals in the area of product liability law. The Court held that a duty to third parties "exists when a defect is such as to render the article in itself imminently dangerous, and serious injury to any person using it is a natural and probable consequence of its use." The Court further held that scaffolding to be used in the painting of a courthouse was an inherently dangerous article. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Devlin v. Smith (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:depiction
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of