An Entity of Type: place, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Brooks v Canada Safeway Ltd [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1219 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on employer discrimination of pregnant employees. The court found that Safeway violated the provincial Human Rights Act by failing to provide equal compensation for those who missed work due to pregnancy. This decision overturned the controversial case of Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada, [1979].

Property Value
dbo:abstract
  • Brooks v Canada Safeway Ltd [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1219 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on employer discrimination of pregnant employees. The court found that Safeway violated the provincial Human Rights Act by failing to provide equal compensation for those who missed work due to pregnancy. This decision overturned the controversial case of Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada, [1979]. In 1982, Susan Brooks, Patricia Allen, and Patricia Dixon were all part-time cashiers at Safeway who became pregnant. The Safeway insurance plan that provided benefits for loss of pay due to accident or sickness did not give full benefits for 17 weeks for those who were unable to work due to pregnancy. The three women brought claims against Safeway for discriminating on the basis of pregnancy for discrimination based on sex. The court held unanimously that the insurance policy was discriminating against pregnant women. (en)
dbo:wikiPageID
  • 3385986 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength
  • 2435 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
  • 1119537576 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
dbp:caseName
  • Brooks v Canada Safeway Ltd (en)
dbp:citations
  • [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1219 (en)
dbp:decidedDate
  • 1989-05-04 (xsd:date)
dbp:docket
  • 20131 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullCaseName
  • Susan Brooks v. Canada Safeway Limited; (en)
  • Patricia Allen and Patricia Dixon and the Manitoba Human Rights Commission v. Canada Safeway Limited (en)
dbp:heardDate
  • 1988-06-15 (xsd:date)
dbp:history
  • Judgment for Safeway in the Manitoba Court of Appeal (en)
dbp:notparticipating
  • Lamer, Le Dain, and McLachlin (en)
dbp:overturnedPreviousCase
  • Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada [1979]. (en)
dbp:ratio
  • Denial of employee benefit to women on leave for pregnancy is discrimination. (en)
dbp:ruling
  • Appeal allowed (en)
dbp:scc
  • 1987 (xsd:integer)
dbp:unanimous
  • Dickson (en)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
dcterms:subject
gold:hypernym
rdf:type
rdfs:comment
  • Brooks v Canada Safeway Ltd [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1219 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on employer discrimination of pregnant employees. The court found that Safeway violated the provincial Human Rights Act by failing to provide equal compensation for those who missed work due to pregnancy. This decision overturned the controversial case of Bliss v. Attorney General of Canada, [1979]. (en)
rdfs:label
  • Brooks v Canada Safeway Ltd (en)
owl:sameAs
prov:wasDerivedFrom
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Powered by OpenLink Virtuoso    This material is Open Knowledge     W3C Semantic Web Technology     This material is Open Knowledge    Valid XHTML + RDFa
This content was extracted from Wikipedia and is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License