• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Wilson v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatEnglishUnfairTermsCases, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: yago:Abstraction100002137yago:Abstraction105854150yago:Case107308889yago:Cognition100023271yago:Concept105835747yago:Content105809192yago:Event100029378yago:Happening107283608yago:HumanRight105176846yago:Idea105833840yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:WikicatHumanRightsInTheUnitedKingdomyago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntityyago:Right105174653yago:WikicatEnglishUnfairTermsCases New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Wilson v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2003] UKHL 40 is a United Kingdom human rights, consumer protection and contract law case. It made a decision on the applicability of Art 1, Prot 1 of the ECHR and some important observations on the relevance of Hansard in litigation. It also raised a small point on unjust enrichment claims under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.