About: Whren v. United States

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Whren v. United States Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FWhren_v._United_States

Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), was a unanimous United States Supreme Court decision that "declared that any traffic offense committed by a driver was a legitimate legal basis for a stop."

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Whren v. United States (en)
rdfs:comment	Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), was a unanimous United States Supreme Court decision that "declared that any traffic offense committed by a driver was a legitimate legal basis for a stop." (en)
foaf:name	Michael A. Whren and James L. Brown, Petitioners, v. United States (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases 1996 in United States case law United States privacy case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court United States Fourth Amendment case law
Wikipage page ID	24319968 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1116547811 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Rodriguez v. United States Delaware v. Prouse List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 517 List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist Court United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit United States District Court for the District of Columbia Virginia v. Moore United States Supreme Court cases Crack cocaine Consent search Equal Protection Clause Antonin Scalia Driving Driving while black African Americans 1996 in United States case law United States privacy case law Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Racial profiling Reasonable suspicion United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court Terry stop Terry v. Ohio United States Fourth Amendment case law L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States Phencyclidine Certiorari Search and seizure Marijuana Stop-and-frisk in New York City United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia F.3d U.S. LEXIS
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/118036/whren-v-united-states/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/111/956/630595/ https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/53/371/498156/ https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=3416424011044753637 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/517/806/case.html https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-5841.ZS.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/1995/95-5841 http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep517/usrep517806/usrep517806.pdf
sameAs	Whren v. United States Whren v. United States Whren v. United States Whren v. United States
Subsequent	25920.0 (second)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:NPOV_section dbt:US4thAmendment
JoinMajority	unanimous (en)
LawsApplied	Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1995/95-5841
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
Prior	25920.0 (second)
USPage	806 (xsd:integer)
USVol	517 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-04-17 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1996 (xsd:integer)
case	Whren v. United States, (en)
courtlistener	https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/118036/whren-v-united-states/
DecideDate	0001-06-10 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1996 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Michael A. Whren and James L. Brown, Petitioners, v. United States (en)
Holding	Any traffic offense committed by a driver is a legitimate legal basis for a traffic stop. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/517/806/case.html
Litigants	Whren v. United States (en)
majority	Scalia (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep517/usrep517806/usrep517806.pdf
has abstract	Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), was a unanimous United States Supreme Court decision that "declared that any traffic offense committed by a driver was a legitimate legal basis for a stop." In an opinion authored by Antonin Scalia, the court held that a search and seizure is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment in cases where the police officers have a "reasonable suspicion" that a traffic violation has occurred. The personal, or subjective, motives of an officer are not a factor in the Court's Fourth Amendment analysis of whether the cause for a stop is sufficient. The standard for reasonable suspicion is purely an objective one. A main concern with this case is that police conducting traffic stops may profile based on race. It also interprets the Fourth Amendment. Both petitioners believe that the traffic stop did not warrant a search of their vehicle and their arrest. Similar to the complaints and outrage about New York City's Stop and Frisk program, some believe that the ruling in Whren v. United States will lead to an increase in racial profiling towards young African American males. (en)
cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-5841.ZS.html
googlescholar	https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=3416424011044753637
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Whren_v._United_States?oldid=1116547811&ns=0

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 38 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software