• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: United States v. Eichman     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:WikicatPoliticalAdvocacyGroupsInTheUnitedStates, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: ThingcaseLegal Caseunit of workLegal caseyago:WikicatAmericanAnti-warActivistsyago:WikicatAnti–VietnamWarGroupsyago:WikicatLivingPeopleyago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesyago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRehnquistCourtyago:Abstraction100002137yago:Act100030358yago:Case107308889yago:CausalAgent100007347yago:Controversy107183151yago:Disagreement107180787yago:Disputant109615465yago:Dispute107181935yago:Event100029378yago:Group100031264yago:Happening107283608yago:LivingThing100004258yago:Militant110315837yago:Object100002684yago:Organism100004475yago:Person100007846yago:PhysicalEntity100001930yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100yago:Reformer110515194yago:YagoLegalActoryago:YagoLegalActorGeoyago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntitySupreme Court of the United States caseyago:SpeechAct107160883yago:Whole100003553yago:WikicatFlagControversiesInTheUnitedStatesyago:WikicatPoliticalAdvocacyGroupsInTheUnitedStates New Facet based on Instances of this Class

United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case that invalidated a federal law against flag desecration as a violation of free speech under the First Amendment. It was argued together with the case United States v. Haggerty. It built on the opinion handed down in the Court's decision the prior year in Texas v. Johnson (1989), which invalidated on First Amendment grounds a Texas state statute banning flag burning.