About: Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FToplak_and_Mrak_v._Slovenia

Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia (34591/19, 42545/19) of 26 October 2021, is the European Court of Human Rights judgment in which the court held that voters' rights were violated when they had no legal right to ask for accessible polling places in advance to achieve accessibility before the election day. The ruling is also significant because the court for the first time extended its jurisdiction to referendums.

AttributesValues
rdfs:label
  • Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia (en)
rdfs:comment
  • Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia (34591/19, 42545/19) of 26 October 2021, is the European Court of Human Rights judgment in which the court held that voters' rights were violated when they had no legal right to ask for accessible polling places in advance to achieve accessibility before the election day. The ruling is also significant because the court for the first time extended its jurisdiction to referendums. (en)
foaf:depiction
  • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Polling_place_in_Ljubljana_Iztok_Mrak.jpg
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
sameAs
SubmitDate
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
thumbnail
outcome
  • Violation (en)
chamber
  • Second Chamber (en)
court
  • ECtHR (en)
DecideDate
fullname
  • Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia (en)
keywords
  • discrimination, disability, accessibility, referendum, secret ballot, right to free elections, right to vote, polling place, voting machines, assistive technology (en)
language
  • English (en)
shortname
  • Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia (en)
has abstract
  • Toplak and Mrak v. Slovenia (34591/19, 42545/19) of 26 October 2021, is the European Court of Human Rights judgment in which the court held that voters' rights were violated when they had no legal right to ask for accessible polling places in advance to achieve accessibility before the election day. The ruling is also significant because the court for the first time extended its jurisdiction to referendums. (en)
CaseNumber
InstrumentsCited
  • European Convention on Human Rights and Protocol 1 (en)
judge
  • Carlo Ranzoni (en)
  • Egidijus Kūris (en)
  • Marko Bošnjak (en)
  • Pauliine Koskelo (en)
  • Saadet Yüksel (en)
  • Jon Fridrik Kjølbro (en)
  • Valeriu Griţco (en)
JudgePresident
  • Róbert Ragnar Spanó (en)
ruling
  • Breaches of Articles 13 (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 59 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software