About: Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FToilet_Goods_Ass%27n%2C_Inc._v._Gardner

Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 158 (1967), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court. It held that judicial review of a regulation's validity was inappropriate because the controversy was not ripe for adjudication. Since it was not clear whether or not an inspection would be ordered and the reasons had not been given by the Commissioner to justify his order, no primary conduct was affected and so no irremediable adverse consequences flowed from requiring a later challenge to the regulation by a manufacturer, who refused to allow inspection.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner (en)
rdfs:comment	Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 158 (1967), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court. It held that judicial review of a regulation's validity was inappropriate because the controversy was not ripe for adjudication. Since it was not clear whether or not an inspection would be ordered and the reasons had not been given by the Commissioner to justify his order, no primary conduct was affected and so no irremediable adverse consequences flowed from requiring a later challenge to the regulation by a manufacturer, who refused to allow inspection. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Toilet Goods Association, Inc., et al. v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al. (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Constitution Article Three case law United States Supreme Court cases 1967 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court United States administrative case law United States ripeness case law
Wikipage page ID	10824193 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1017081922 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	United States Constitution Article Three case law Judicial review List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 387 United States Supreme Court cases Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner Food and Drug Administration 1967 in United States case law United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court United States administrative case law United States ripeness case law L. Ed. 2d Supreme Court of the United States
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep387/usrep387158/usrep387158.pdf https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/387/158/ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1966/336
sameAs	Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:SCOTUS-case-stub dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:USArticleIII
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/1966/336
ParallelCitations	172800.0 (second)
USPage	158 (xsd:integer)
USVol	387 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-01-16 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	1967 (xsd:integer)
case	Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v. Gardner, (en)
DecideDate	0001-05-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	1967 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Toilet Goods Association, Inc., et al. v. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, et al. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/387/158/
Litigants	Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. Gardner (en)
loc	http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep387/usrep387158/usrep387158.pdf
has abstract	Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 158 (1967), was a case heard before the United States Supreme Court. It held that judicial review of a regulation's validity was inappropriate because the controversy was not ripe for adjudication. Since it was not clear whether or not an inspection would be ordered and the reasons had not been given by the Commissioner to justify his order, no primary conduct was affected and so no irremediable adverse consequences flowed from requiring a later challenge to the regulation by a manufacturer, who refused to allow inspection. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Toilet_Goods_Ass'n,_Inc._v._Gardner?oldid=1017081922&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	3470 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Toilet_Goods_Ass'n,_Inc._v._Gardner
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	387 U.S. 158 Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v Gardner Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. Gardner Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v Gardner Toilet Goods Assn., Inc. v. Gardner Toilet Goods Association v. Gardner
is Wikipage redirect of	387 U.S. 158 Toilet Goods Ass'n, Inc. v Gardner Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. Gardner Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v Gardner Toilet Goods Assn., Inc. v. Gardner Toilet Goods Association v. Gardner
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Toilet_Goods_Ass'n,_Inc._v._Gardner

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 49 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software