• Facets (new session)
• Description
• Metadata
• Settings
  • Rule: ActivityStreamsMapasEquivalentb3sb3sifpdbprdf-labelfacetshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#ldpoplwebskos-transurn:det:rdf:labelvirtrdf-labelvirtrdf-urlNone
    
  • Inverse Functional Properties: Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects
  • "Same As": Disabled (fastest) Apply to subjects only Apply to objects only Apply to both subjects and objects (recommended) Apply to subjects, objects and predicates (not recommended on big datasets) Apply to predicates only (special use cases only)

About: Sherlock Holmes Was Wrong     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : yago:Wikicat2008Books, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)

Type: Thingbibo:Bookschema:Bookschema:CreativeWorkworkText (literary theory)wikidata:Q386724Bookyago:WikicatBooksOfLiteraryCriticismyago:WikicatWorksBasedOnSherlockHolmesyago:Artifact100021939yago:Book106410904yago:Creation103129123yago:EndProduct103287178yago:Object100002684yago:Oeuvre103841417yago:PhysicalEntity100001930yago:Product104007894yago:Publication106589574yago:Work104599396bookwritten workyago:Whole100003553yago:Wikicat2008Books New Facet based on Instances of this Class

Sherlock Holmes was Wrong: Re-opening the Case of the "Hound of the Baskervilles" is a 2007 book by French professor of literature, psychoanalyst, and author Pierre Bayard. By re-examining the clues and interpreting them in the context in which Arthur Conan Doyle's book The Hound of the Baskervilles was conceived and written, Bayard clears the hound of all wrongdoing and argues that the actual murderer got away with the crime completely unsuspected by Sherlock Holmes—not to mention by the numerous readers of the story over the past century and even, in a sense, by the author himself.