About: Ryanair p.l.c. v Aer Rianta c.p.t.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Ryanair p.l.c. v Aer Rianta c.p.t. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : owl:Thing, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

Ryanair p.l.c. v Aer Rianta c.p.t. [2003] IESC 62; [2003] 4 IR 264 is a reported Irish Supreme Court case that dealt with the law of discovery. In his judgement, Fennelly J. reinforced the test that discovery will only be granted if the court is satisfied that the documents sought are: (i) relevant to the issues in the proceedings; and (ii) that discovery is necessary for fairly disposing of the matter and for saving costs. The court noted that in order for documents to satisfy this test the applicant does not have to prove that they are, "in any sense absolutely necessary". Rather all he has to do is prove that he would suffer a "litigious disadvantage by not seeing them". The burden of proof rests firmly on the party seeking the discovery.

Attributes	Values
rdfs:label	Ryanair p.l.c. v Aer Rianta c.p.t. (en)
rdfs:comment	Ryanair p.l.c. v Aer Rianta c.p.t. [2003] IESC 62; [2003] 4 IR 264 is a reported Irish Supreme Court case that dealt with the law of discovery. In his judgement, Fennelly J. reinforced the test that discovery will only be granted if the court is satisfied that the documents sought are: (i) relevant to the issues in the proceedings; and (ii) that discovery is necessary for fairly disposing of the matter and for saving costs. The court noted that in order for documents to satisfy this test the applicant does not have to prove that they are, "in any sense absolutely necessary". Rather all he has to do is prove that he would suffer a "litigious disadvantage by not seeing them". The burden of proof rests firmly on the party seeking the discovery. (en)
name	Ryanair P.L.C. v Aer Rianta C.P.T. (en)
dct:subject	2003 in case law 2003 in Irish law 2003 in the Republic of Ireland Supreme Court of Ireland cases
Wikipage page ID	61959577 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1082198865 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	2003 in case law DAA (Irish company) Statutory instrument Ryanair 2003 in Irish law Aer Lingus 2003 in the Republic of Ireland Discovery (law) Supreme Court of Ireland cases Affidavit Supreme Court of Ireland Coat of arms of Ireland High Court (Ireland) Necessity (tort)
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1999/si/233/made/en/print https://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IESC/2003/62.html
sameAs	Ryanair p.l.c. v Aer Rianta c.p.t. Ryanair p.l.c. v Aer Rianta c.p.t.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Infobox_court_case
caption	Coat of arms of Ireland
citations	[2003] IESC 62, [2003] 4 IR 264, [2004] 1 ILRM 241 (en)
court	Supreme Court of Ireland
full name	Ryanair P.L.C. v Aer Rianta C.P.T. [2003] 4 IR 264 (en)
italic title	Ryanair P.L.C. v Aer Rianta C.P.T (en)
judges	Fennelly J., McCracken J., and Denham J. (en)
keywords	Discovery, Necessity, Relevance (en)
has abstract	Ryanair p.l.c. v Aer Rianta c.p.t. [2003] IESC 62; [2003] 4 IR 264 is a reported Irish Supreme Court case that dealt with the law of discovery. In his judgement, Fennelly J. reinforced the test that discovery will only be granted if the court is satisfied that the documents sought are: (i) relevant to the issues in the proceedings; and (ii) that discovery is necessary for fairly disposing of the matter and for saving costs. The court noted that in order for documents to satisfy this test the applicant does not have to prove that they are, "in any sense absolutely necessary". Rather all he has to do is prove that he would suffer a "litigious disadvantage by not seeing them". The burden of proof rests firmly on the party seeking the discovery. (en)
appealed from	The Irish High Court (en)
appealed to	The Irish Supreme Court (en)
concurring	Denham J. (en)
date decided	2 (xsd:integer)
decision by	Fennelly J., and McCracken J. (en)
number of judges	3 (xsd:integer)
opinions	The applicant does not have to prove that the documents sought to be discovered are in any sense absolutely necessary but rather that he would suffer a litigious disadvantage by not seeing them. (en)
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Ryanair_p.l.c._v_Aer_Rianta_c.p.t.?oldid=1082198865&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	9144 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Ryanair_p.l.c._v_Aer_Rianta_c.p.t.
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of Irish Supreme Court cases
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Ryanair_p.l.c._v_Aer_Rianta_c.p.t.

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git147 as of Sep 06 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3331 as of Sep 2 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (378 GB total memory, 58 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software