Religion and peacebuilding refer to the study of religion's role in the development of peace. Nathan C. Funk and Christina J. Woolner categorize these approaches into three models. The first is “peace through religion alone”. This proposes to attain world peace through devotion to a given religion. Opponents claim that advocates generally want to attain peace through their particular religion only and have little tolerance of other ideologies. The second model, a response to the first, is “peace without religion”. Critics claim that it is overly simplistic and fails to address other causes of conflict as well as the peace potential of religion. It is also said that this model excludes the many contributions of religious people in the development of peace. Another critique claims that both
| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdfs:label
| - Religion and peacebuilding (en)
- 宗教与创建和平 (zh)
|
| rdfs:comment
| - 宗教与创建和平研究的是宗教在发展和平中的作用。学者们普遍接受的一个观点是：宗教在不同的历史时刻，对于和平既起过促进作用，也起过破坏作用。对此，有很多不同的解释方法。 和将诸多解释方法划分为三种模式。第一种是“唯有通过宗教才有和平”。这种模式建议通过对于特定宗教的信奉，实现世界和平。反对者称它的倡导者只想通过他们自己的宗教实现和平，对于其他的意识形态缺乏宽容。 作为对第一种模式的反思，第二种模式是“无宗教的和平”。批评者称第二种模式太过简单化，忽视了冲突的其他原因，以及宗教的和平潜力。另有批评者称第二种模式排斥了宗教信徒。还有批评者称前两种模式都有将自己的意识形态强加与人之嫌。 第三种、也是最后一种模式叫做“与宗教共同和平”。这种模式专注于共存和宗教对话的重要性。 称宗教对于和平既不固有地好，也不是固有地坏，而宗教的作用又不容否认。 与宗教共和平，强调促进各大宗教的共同原则。 宗教与建构和平的一个主要促成者是那些有信仰背景的非政府组织.指出，有宗教信仰背景的非政府组织有两个显著的优势。第一，鉴于它们常常是地方性的，它们对于当地社区有直接的影响力。他认为“让当地人主动与昂冲突和建构和平非常重要，越早这样做越好”。他指出的第二个优势是，有信仰背景的非政府组织具有道德权威，有利于和平协议和政策被民众所接受。 (zh)
- Religion and peacebuilding refer to the study of religion's role in the development of peace. Nathan C. Funk and Christina J. Woolner categorize these approaches into three models. The first is “peace through religion alone”. This proposes to attain world peace through devotion to a given religion. Opponents claim that advocates generally want to attain peace through their particular religion only and have little tolerance of other ideologies. The second model, a response to the first, is “peace without religion”. Critics claim that it is overly simplistic and fails to address other causes of conflict as well as the peace potential of religion. It is also said that this model excludes the many contributions of religious people in the development of peace. Another critique claims that both (en)
|
| foaf:depiction
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| Wikipage page ID
| |
| Wikipage revision ID
| |
| Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
| |
| sameAs
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| thumbnail
| |
| has abstract
| - Religion and peacebuilding refer to the study of religion's role in the development of peace. Nathan C. Funk and Christina J. Woolner categorize these approaches into three models. The first is “peace through religion alone”. This proposes to attain world peace through devotion to a given religion. Opponents claim that advocates generally want to attain peace through their particular religion only and have little tolerance of other ideologies. The second model, a response to the first, is “peace without religion”. Critics claim that it is overly simplistic and fails to address other causes of conflict as well as the peace potential of religion. It is also said that this model excludes the many contributions of religious people in the development of peace. Another critique claims that both approaches require bringing everyone into their own ideology. The third and final approach is known as “peace with religion”. This approach focuses on the importance of coexistence and interfaith dialogue. Gerrie ter Haar suggests that religion is neither inherently good nor bad for peace, and that its influence is undeniable. Peace with religion, then, emphasises promoting the common principles present in every major religion. A major component of religion and peacebuilding is faith-based non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Douglas Johnston points out that faith-based NGOs offer two distinct advantages. The first is that since faith-based NGOs are very often locally based, they have immediate influence within that community. He argues that “it is important to promote indigenous ownership of conflict prevention and peacebuilding initiatives as early in the process as possible.” The second advantage Johnston presents is that faith-based NGOs carry moral authority that contributes to the receptivity of negotiations and policies for peace. (en)
- 宗教与创建和平研究的是宗教在发展和平中的作用。学者们普遍接受的一个观点是：宗教在不同的历史时刻，对于和平既起过促进作用，也起过破坏作用。对此，有很多不同的解释方法。 和将诸多解释方法划分为三种模式。第一种是“唯有通过宗教才有和平”。这种模式建议通过对于特定宗教的信奉，实现世界和平。反对者称它的倡导者只想通过他们自己的宗教实现和平，对于其他的意识形态缺乏宽容。 作为对第一种模式的反思，第二种模式是“无宗教的和平”。批评者称第二种模式太过简单化，忽视了冲突的其他原因，以及宗教的和平潜力。另有批评者称第二种模式排斥了宗教信徒。还有批评者称前两种模式都有将自己的意识形态强加与人之嫌。 第三种、也是最后一种模式叫做“与宗教共同和平”。这种模式专注于共存和宗教对话的重要性。 称宗教对于和平既不固有地好，也不是固有地坏，而宗教的作用又不容否认。 与宗教共和平，强调促进各大宗教的共同原则。 宗教与建构和平的一个主要促成者是那些有信仰背景的非政府组织.指出，有宗教信仰背景的非政府组织有两个显著的优势。第一，鉴于它们常常是地方性的，它们对于当地社区有直接的影响力。他认为“让当地人主动与昂冲突和建构和平非常重要，越早这样做越好”。他指出的第二个优势是，有信仰背景的非政府组织具有道德权威，有利于和平协议和政策被民众所接受。 (zh)
|
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| page length (characters) of wiki page
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
of | |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)
