R v Mills, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 668 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court upheld the newly enacted rape shield law when challenged as a violation to section 7 and 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The rape shield law was the second of its type, the first having been struck down in R. v. Seaboyer. Accordingly, this case is often cited as an example of judicial dialogue.
Attributes | Values |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
rdfs:label |
|
rdfs:comment |
|
dcterms:subject | |
Wikipage page ID |
|
Wikipage revision ID |
|
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage |
|
Link from a Wikipage to an external page | |
sameAs | |
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate | |
docket |
|
JoinMajority |
|
citations |
|
majority |
|
has abstract |
|
case-name |
|
Concurrence/Dissent |
|
decided-date |
|
heard-date |
|
SCC |
|
gold:hypernym | |
prov:wasDerivedFrom | |
page length (characters) of wiki page |
|
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf | |
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of | |
is Wikipage redirect of | |
is Wikipage disambiguates of | |
is foaf:primaryTopic of |