About: R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FR_v_Crown_Zellerbach_Canada_Ltd

R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd [1988] 1 S.C.R. 401, is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. A deeply-divided Court upheld the validity of the Ocean Dumping Act, now part of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, by finding that all matters related to polluting the ocean are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government owing to the national concern branch of the "peace, order, and good government" clause in the British North America Act, 1867 (now known as the Constitution Act, 1867).

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • R. c. Crown Zellerbabach Canada Ltd (fr)
  • R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd (en)
rdfs:comment
  • R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd [1988] 1 S.C.R. 401, is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. A deeply-divided Court upheld the validity of the Ocean Dumping Act, now part of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, by finding that all matters related to polluting the ocean are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government owing to the national concern branch of the "peace, order, and good government" clause in the British North America Act, 1867 (now known as the Constitution Act, 1867). (en)
  • R. c. Crown Zellerbabach Canada Ltd est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada en matière de partage des compétences et de droit de l'environnement. Un tribunal profondément divisé a confirmé la validité de la Loi sur l'immersion de déchets en mer, qui fait maintenant partie de la Loi canadienne sur la protection de l'environnement - concluant que toutes les questions liées à la pollution de l'océan relèvent de la compétence exclusive du gouvernement fédéral en raison de la clause paix, ordre et bon gouvernement de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867. (fr)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
citations
  • [1988] 1 SCR 401, 49 DLR 161 (en)
history
  • Act found ultra vires at trial, BCCA dismissed appeal (en)
ratio
  • All matters relating to polluting the ocean are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government owing to the national concern branch of the "peace, order, and good government" clause. (en)
has abstract
  • R. c. Crown Zellerbabach Canada Ltd est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême du Canada en matière de partage des compétences et de droit de l'environnement. Un tribunal profondément divisé a confirmé la validité de la Loi sur l'immersion de déchets en mer, qui fait maintenant partie de la Loi canadienne sur la protection de l'environnement - concluant que toutes les questions liées à la pollution de l'océan relèvent de la compétence exclusive du gouvernement fédéral en raison de la clause paix, ordre et bon gouvernement de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867. L'opinion majoritaire a été rédigée par le juge Le Dain (avec le juge en chef Dickson et les juges McIntyre et Wilson) et reposait sur l'unicité, le caractère distinctif et l'indivisibilité de la préoccupation nationale visée par la Loi sur l'immersion de déchets mer. L'opinion minoritaire a été rédigée par le juge La Forest (rejoint par les juges Beetz et Lamer). (fr)
  • R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd [1988] 1 S.C.R. 401, is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. A deeply-divided Court upheld the validity of the Ocean Dumping Act, now part of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, by finding that all matters related to polluting the ocean are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal government owing to the national concern branch of the "peace, order, and good government" clause in the British North America Act, 1867 (now known as the Constitution Act, 1867). The majority opinion was written by Le Dain J (joined by Dickson CJ, and McIntyre and Wilson JJ) and hinged on the "singleness, distinctiveness, and indivisibility" of the national concern that the Ocean Dumping Act addressed. The minority opinion was written by La Forest J (joined by Beetz and Lamer JJ). (en)
case-name
  • R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd (en)
decided-date
heard-date
  • N/A (en)
ruling
  • Act is intra vires, appeal allowed (en)
gold:hypernym
prov:wasDerivedFrom
page length (characters) of wiki page
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of
is Wikipage redirect of
is foaf:primaryTopic of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 38 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software