About: R v Burlingham

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: R v Burlingham Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FR_v_Burlingham

R v Burlingham, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 206 is a leading decision on the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to counsel under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the exclusion of evidence under section 24(2).

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	R v Burlingham (en)
rdfs:comment	R v Burlingham, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 206 is a leading decision on the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to counsel under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the exclusion of evidence under section 24(2). (en)
dcterms:subject	1995 in Canadian case law Supreme Court of Canada cases Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law
Wikipage page ID	4974431 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1112303416 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	1995 in Canadian case law British Columbia Court of Appeal List of Supreme Court of Canada cases Supreme Court of Canada cases Supreme Court of Canada Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section Twenty-four of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Section Ten of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
sameAs	R v Burlingham R v Burlingham R v Burlingham
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Cquote dbt:SCCInfoBox dbt:Lexum-scc2
docket	23966 (xsd:integer)
JoinMajority	La Forest, Sopinka, Cory and Major JJ. (en)
citations	[1995] 2 S.C.R. 206 (en)
history	Judgment for the Crown in the British Columbia Court of Appeal. (en)
majority	Iacobucci J. (en)
ratio	Section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms requires: #The police hold off questioning a detainee until they have exercised their rights to counsel. #The police to not belittle a detainee's lawyer. #The police given a detainee an opportunity to speak to a lawyer when offering a plea deal. (en)
has abstract	R v Burlingham, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 206 is a leading decision on the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to counsel under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the exclusion of evidence under section 24(2). (en)
case-name	R v Burlingham (en)
Concurrence	Sopinka J. (en) Gonthier J. (en)
Concurrence/Dissent	L'Heureux‑Dubé J. (en)
decided-date	1995-05-18 (xsd:date)
full-case-name	Terrence Wayne Burlingham v. Her Majesty The Queen (en)
heard-date	1994-11-09 (xsd:date)
JoinConcurrence	Cory, Iacobucci and Major JJ. (en)
NotParticipating	Lamer C.J. and McLachlin J. (en)
ruling	Appeal allowed (en)
SCC	1992 (xsd:integer)
gold:hypernym	Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:R_v_Burlingham?oldid=1112303416&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	3790 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:R_v_Burlingham
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Lamer Court) Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Sopinka R. v. Burlingham
is Wikipage redirect of	R. v. Burlingham
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:R_v_Burlingham

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 53 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software