About: Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FPetrella_v._Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer%2C_Inc.

Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U.S. 663 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court copyright decision in which the Court held 6-3 that the equitable defense of laches is not available to copyright defendants in claims for damages.

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Thing case Legal Case unit of work Legal case yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (en)
rdfs:comment	Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U.S. 663 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court copyright decision in which the Court held 6-3 that the equitable defense of laches is not available to copyright defendants in claims for damages. (en)
foaf:name	(en) Paula Petrella, Petitioner v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al. (en)
dcterms:subject	United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer United States copyright case law 2014 in United States case law
Wikipage page ID	42833856 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1096912773 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	United States Copyright Act of 1976 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States District Court for the Central District of California Derivative work United States Supreme Court cases United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court Estoppel Boxing ring Copyright Damages Stewart v. Abend Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer 9th Cir. United States copyright case law Equitable tolling Equity (legal concept) Raging Bull: My Story Jake LaMotta 2014 in United States case law L. Ed. 2d Laches (equity) Supreme Court of the United States Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Raging Bull Certiorari United Artists Corporation F.3d Justice Breyer Justice Ginsburg U.S.P.Q.2d
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/12-1315 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_1315/argument https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/12-1315 http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/petrella-v-metro-goldwyn-mayer-inc/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/572/12-1315/ https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20120829151 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-1315_f20h.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-1315_ook3.pdf
sameAs	Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:USCSub dbt:USArticleI
Dissent	Breyer (en)
docket	12 (xsd:integer)
JoinDissent	Roberts, Kennedy (en)
JoinMajority	Scalia, Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan (en)
LawsApplied	United States Copyright Act of 1976
OpinionAnnouncement	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-1315_ook3.pdf
OralArgument	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_1315/argument
oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/12-1315
ParallelCitations	17280.0 (second)
Prior	25920.0 (second)
USPage	663 (xsd:integer)
USVol	572 (xsd:integer)
ArgueDate	0001-01-21 (xsd:gMonthDay)
ArgueYear	2014 (xsd:integer)
case	Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., (en)
DecideDate	0001-05-19 (xsd:gMonthDay)
DecideYear	2014 (xsd:integer)
fullname	Paula Petrella, Petitioner v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al. (en)
Holding	Reversed and remanded. Laches cannot be invoked as a bar to a pursuit of a claim for damages brought within the three-year window provided by . Because laches is an equitable doctrine, it can have no role in determining the timeliness of an action for damages. (en)
justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/572/12-1315/
Litigants	Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. (en)
majority	Ginsburg (en)
other source	Supreme Court (en)
other url	https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/12-1315_f20h.pdf
has abstract	Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 572 U.S. 663 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court copyright decision in which the Court held 6-3 that the equitable defense of laches is not available to copyright defendants in claims for damages. (en)
cornell	https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/12-1315
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Petrella_v._Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer,_Inc.?oldid=1096912773&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	8695 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (62 GB total memory, 54 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software