About: Ngati Apa v Attorney-General

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- Rule:
- Inverse Functional Properties:
- "Same As":

About: Ngati Apa v Attorney-General Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon

http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FNgati_Apa_v_Attorney-General

Ngati Apa v Attorney-General was a landmark legal decision that sparked the New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy. The case arose from an application by eight northern South Island iwi for orders declaring the foreshore and seabed of the Marlborough Sounds Maori customary land. After lower court decisions and consequent appeals in the Maori Land Court, the Maori Appellate Court and the High Court; the Court of Appeal unanimously held that the Maori Land Court had jurisdiction to determine whether areas of foreshore and seabed were Maori customary land or not. The court also held that, "The transfer of sovereignty did not affect customary property. They are interests preserved by the common law until extinguished in accordance with the law". The effect of the decision was subsequentl

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	Supreme Court of the United States case
rdfs:label	Ngati Apa v Attorney-General (en)
rdfs:comment	Ngati Apa v Attorney-General was a landmark legal decision that sparked the New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy. The case arose from an application by eight northern South Island iwi for orders declaring the foreshore and seabed of the Marlborough Sounds Maori customary land. After lower court decisions and consequent appeals in the Maori Land Court, the Maori Appellate Court and the High Court; the Court of Appeal unanimously held that the Maori Land Court had jurisdiction to determine whether areas of foreshore and seabed were Maori customary land or not. The court also held that, "The transfer of sovereignty did not affect customary property. They are interests preserved by the common law until extinguished in accordance with the law". The effect of the decision was subsequentl (en)
name	Ngati Apa v Attorney-General (en)
foaf:depiction
dcterms:subject	Treaty of Waitangi 2003 in case law 2003 in New Zealand law Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases
Wikipage page ID	47675888 (xsd:integer)
Wikipage revision ID	1116913042 (xsd:integer)
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage	Treaty of Waitangi 2003 in case law Iwi Court of Appeal of New Zealand Government of New Zealand Thomas Gault Andrew Tipping Sian Elias List of national legal systems Marlborough Sounds 2003 in New Zealand law Customary law New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy Francis Dart Fenton Noel Anderson Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 Resource Management Act 1991 Court of Appeal of New Zealand cases Aboriginal title Kenneth Keith In Re the Ninety-Mile Beach Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Māori Land Court Foreshore and seabed
Link from a Wikipage to an external page	http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2003/117.html
sameAs	Ngati Apa v Attorney-General Ngati Apa v Attorney-General
transcripts	http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZCA/2003/117.html
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Quote dbt:Reflist dbt:Short_description dbt:Use_New_Zealand_English dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Infobox_court_case dbt:Treaty_of_Waitangi
thumbnail	wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Coat_of_arms_of_New_Zealand.svg?width=300
citations	[2003] NZCA 117; [2003] 3 NZLR 643 (en)
court	Court of Appeal of New Zealand
full name	Ngati Apa & Anor v. Attorney-General & Others (en)
judges	Elias CJ, Gault P, Keith, Tipping & Anderson JJ (en)
keywords	Aboriginal title Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 Foreshore and seabed
has abstract	Ngati Apa v Attorney-General was a landmark legal decision that sparked the New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy. The case arose from an application by eight northern South Island iwi for orders declaring the foreshore and seabed of the Marlborough Sounds Maori customary land. After lower court decisions and consequent appeals in the Maori Land Court, the Maori Appellate Court and the High Court; the Court of Appeal unanimously held that the Maori Land Court had jurisdiction to determine whether areas of foreshore and seabed were Maori customary land or not. The court also held that, "The transfer of sovereignty did not affect customary property. They are interests preserved by the common law until extinguished in accordance with the law". The effect of the decision was subsequently overturned by the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004. (en)
date decided	2003-06-19 (xsd:date)
prior actions	[2002] 2 NZLR 661 (en)
gold:hypernym	Decision
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Ngati_Apa_v_Attorney-General?oldid=1116913042&ns=0
page length (characters) of wiki page	10917 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Ngati_Apa_v_Attorney-General
is rdfs:seeAlso of	New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy In Re the Ninety-Mile Beach
is Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage of	R v Symonds Andrew Tipping New Zealand foreshore and seabed controversy Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 Aboriginal title Heta Hingston In Re the Ninety-Mile Beach
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Ngati_Apa_v_Attorney-General

Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 49 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software