About: New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase, within Data Space : dbpedia.org associated with source document(s)
QRcode icon
http://dbpedia.org/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FNew_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Association%2C_Inc._v._City_of_New_York

New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York, New York, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), abbreviated NYSRPA v. NYC and also known as NYSRPA I to distinguish it from the subsequent case, was a case addressing whether the gun ownership laws of New York City, which restrict the transport of a licensed firearm out of one's home, violated the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause, and the right to travel. It was the first major gun-related case that the Supreme Court had accepted for review in nearly ten years, after District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010). After the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, New York City and New York state amended its laws to allay the challenged provision. In a

AttributesValues
rdf:type
rdfs:label
  • New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York (en)
  • 紐約州步槍及手槍協會訴紐約市案 (zh)
rdfs:comment
  • 紐約州步槍及手槍協會訴紐約市案(New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York, New York), 590 US ___ (2020)、縮寫為 NYSRPA v. NYC,亦稱為 NYSRPA I(以區別於)本案件涉及紐約市的槍支所有權法;該法限制將持牌槍支帶出家門,是否違反了美國憲法第二修正案、以及旅行權。這是繼(2008年)、與(2010年)之後,美國最高法院近十年來接受審查的第一起重大槍支的相關案件。在美國最高法院同意審理此案後,紐約市及紐約州修改了法律以緩和受到質疑的條款。在2020年4月的一項法庭判決中,美國最高法院確定本案沒有實際意義,將本案件廢止並將案件發回下級法院;以確定“請願人是否仍可在本訴訟案中依據紐約市的舊有法規增加損害賠償的要求”。 在紐約市修改相關的法律之前,本案被視為最高法院的保守多數派在擴大美國槍支權利的可能性工具。在一份不同意見説明書中,阿利託大法官、戈薩奇大法官以及托馬斯大法官表示,他們認為本案沒有實際意義;紐約市的法律侵犯了請願人在美國第二修正案上之權利,而下級法院對"海勒"(Heller)的解釋過於狹隘。卡瓦諾大法官表示同意;但也同意阿利託大法官立場,即是最高法院應審查海勒目前在下級法院的申請。 (zh)
  • New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York, New York, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), abbreviated NYSRPA v. NYC and also known as NYSRPA I to distinguish it from the subsequent case, was a case addressing whether the gun ownership laws of New York City, which restrict the transport of a licensed firearm out of one's home, violated the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause, and the right to travel. It was the first major gun-related case that the Supreme Court had accepted for review in nearly ten years, after District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010). After the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case, New York City and New York state amended its laws to allay the challenged provision. In a (en)
foaf:name
  • (en)
  • New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., et al. v. City of New York, New York, et al. (en)
dcterms:subject
Wikipage page ID
Wikipage revision ID
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
sameAs
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
Dissent
  • Alito (en)
docket
JoinDissent
  • Gorsuch; Thomas (en)
LawsApplied
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
Faceted Search & Find service v1.17_git139 as of Feb 29 2024


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 08.03.3330 as of Mar 19 2024, on Linux (x86_64-generic-linux-glibc212), Single-Server Edition (61 GB total memory, 42 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2024 OpenLink Software